» Articles » PMID: 15175835

The Performance Of( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Small Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

Overview
Date 2004 Jun 4
PMID 15175835
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN, intraparenchymal lung mass <3 cm) is often a diagnostic challenge. This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in radiologically indeterminate SPN < or =10 mm on spiral CT. Between August 1997 and March 2001, we identified all patients with radiologically indeterminate SPNs < or =10 mm who were referred for FDG PET imaging at the VU University Medical Centre. All PET scans were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. PET was considered positive in cases with at least moderately enhanced focal uptake, and otherwise as negative. Lesions were considered benign on the basis of histology, no growth during 1.5 years or disappearance within at least 6 months. Thirty-five patients with 36 SPNs < or =10 mm in diameter at clinical presentation were identified (one patient had two metachronous lesions). In 13 of 14 malignant nodules and in two of 22 benign nodules, diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Prevalence of malignancy was 39%. PET imaging correctly identified 30 of 36 small lesions. One lesion proved to be false negative on PET (CT: 10 mm), and in five lesions, PET scans proved to be false positive. Specificity was 77% (17/22; 95% CI: 0.55-0.92), sensitivity 93% (13/14; 95% CI: 0.66-1.0), positive predictive value 72% (13/18; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90) and negative predictive value 94% (17/18; 95% CI: 0.73-1.0). This retrospective study suggests that FDG PET imaging could be a useful tool in differentiating benign from malignant SPNs < or =10 mm in diameter at clinical presentation. Such results may help in the design of larger prospective trials with structured clinical work-up.

Citing Articles

The role of radiological and clinical findings in determining lobectomy decision in patients with undiagnosed resectable lung lesions.

Oksuz Gungor B, Topaloglu O, Karapolat S, Turkyilmaz A, Akdogan A, Tekinbas C Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2024; 32(3):325-332.

PMID: 39513164 PMC: 11538939. DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.26403.


Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.

Wu Z, Guo B, Huang B, Hao X, Wu P, Zhao B Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10328.

PMID: 33990659 PMC: 8121798. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89725-z.


A retrospective study analyzing missed diagnosis of lung metastases at their early stages on computed tomography.

Chen H, Huang S, Zeng Q, Zhang M, Ni Z, Li X J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11(8):3360-3368.

PMID: 31559039 PMC: 6753459. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.19.


Comparing the diagnostic value of F-FDG-PET/CT versus CT for differentiating benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

Jia Y, Gong W, Zhang Z, Tu G, Li J, Xiong F J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11(5):2082-2098.

PMID: 31285902 PMC: 6588752. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.21.


Looking for Lepidic Component inside Invasive Adenocarcinomas Appearing as CT Solid Solitary Pulmonary Nodules (SPNs): CT Morpho-Densitometric Features and 18-FDG PET Findings.

Reginelli A, Capasso R, Petrillo M, Rossi C, Faella P, Grassi R Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:7683648.

PMID: 30733967 PMC: 6348850. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7683648.


References
1.
Keagy B, Starek P, Murray G, Battaglini J, Lores M, Wilcox B . Major pulmonary resection for suspected but unconfirmed malignancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984; 38(4):314-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62278-3. View

2.
Swensen S, Jett J, Payne W, Viggiano R, Pairolero P, Trastek V . An integrated approach to evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990; 65(2):173-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65012-5. View

3.
van Rens M, de la Riviere A, Elbers H, van den Bosch J . Prognostic assessment of 2,361 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer, stage I, II, and IIIA. Chest. 2000; 117(2):374-9. DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.2.374. View

4.
Vansteenkiste J, Stroobants S, Dupont P, De Leyn P, De Wever W, Verbeken E . FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: do anatometabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localisation of regional lymph node metastases? The Leuven Lung Cancer Group. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998; 25(11):1495-501. DOI: 10.1007/s002590050327. View

5.
Yankelevitz D, Reeves A, Kostis W, Zhao B, Henschke C . Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology. 2000; 217(1):251-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc33251. View