» Articles » PMID: 15170569

The Evolution of Patterning of Serially Homologous Appendages in Insects

Overview
Journal Dev Genes Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2004 Jun 2
PMID 15170569
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arthropod bodies are formed by a series of appendage-bearing segments, and appendages have diversified both along the body axis within species and between species. Understanding the developmental basis of this variation is essential for addressing questions about the evolutionary diversification of limbs. We examined the development of serially homologous appendages of two insect species, the beetle Tribolium castaneum and the grasshopper Schistocerca americana. Both species retain aspects of ancestral appendage morphology and development that have been lost in Drosophila, including branched mouthparts and direct development of appendages during embryogenesis. We characterized the expression of four genes important in proximodistal axis development of Drosophila appendages: the secreted signaling factors wingless and decapentaplegic, and the homeodomain transcription factors extradenticle and Distal-less. Our comparisons focus on two aspects of appendage morphology: differentiation of the main axis of serial homologues and the appearance of proximal branches (endites) in the mouthparts. Although Distal-less expression is similar in endites and palps of the mouthparts, the expression of other genes in the endites does not conform to their known roles in axial patterning, leading us to reject the hypothesis that branched insect mouthparts develop by reiteration of the limb patterning network. With the exception of decapentaplegic, patterning of the main appendage axis is generally more similar in direct homologues than in serial homologues. Interestingly, however, phylogenetic comparisons suggest that patterning of serial homologues was more similar in ancestral insects, and thus that the observed developmental differences did not cause the evolutionary divergence in morphology among serial homologues.

Citing Articles

The functional evolution of collembolan Ubx on the regulation of abdominal appendage formation.

Liang Y, Luan Y Dev Genes Evol. 2024; 234(2):135-151.

PMID: 38980376 PMC: 7616481. DOI: 10.1007/s00427-024-00718-0.


Cooption of an appendage-patterning gene cassette in the head segmentation of arachnids.

Setton E, Sharma P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(15):E3491-E3500.

PMID: 29581309 PMC: 5899462. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720193115.


The pivotal role of aristaless in development and evolution of diverse antennal morphologies in moths and butterflies.

Ando T, Fujiwara H, Kojima T BMC Evol Biol. 2018; 18(1):8.

PMID: 29370752 PMC: 5785806. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1124-2.


Co-option of a motor-to-sensory histaminergic circuit correlates with insect flight biomechanics.

Chapman P, Bradley S, Haught E, Riggs K, Haffar M, Daly K Proc Biol Sci. 2017; 284(1859).

PMID: 28747471 PMC: 5543211. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0339.


Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A specify the abdominal appendage in a dosage-dependent manner in silkworm, Bombyx mori.

Tong X, Fu M, Chen P, Chen L, Xiang Z, Lu C Heredity (Edinb). 2017; 118(6):578-584.

PMID: 28121309 PMC: 5436023. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.131.


References
1.
Popadic A, Panganiban G, Rusch D, Shear W, Kaufman T . Molecular evidence for the gnathobasic derivation of arthropod mandibles and for the appendicular origin of the labrum and other structures. Dev Genes Evol. 1998; 208(3):142-50. DOI: 10.1007/s004270050165. View

2.
Prpic N, Janssen R, Wigand B, Klingler M, Damen W . Gene expression in spider appendages reveals reversal of exd/hth spatial specificity, altered leg gap gene dynamics, and suggests divergent distal morphogen signaling. Dev Biol. 2003; 264(1):119-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.002. View

3.
Dong P, Chu J, Panganiban G . Proximodistal domain specification and interactions in developing Drosophila appendages. Development. 2001; 128(12):2365-72. DOI: 10.1242/dev.128.12.2365. View

4.
Cummins M, Pueyo J, Greig S, Couso J . Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Genes Evol. 2003; 213(7):319-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00427-003-0326-8. View

5.
Palopoli M, Patel N . Evolution of the interaction between Hox genes and a downstream target. Curr Biol. 1998; 8(10):587-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70228-3. View