» Articles » PMID: 15157284

Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium and Haplotype Distribution in Disease Candidate Genes

Overview
Journal BMC Genet
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2004 May 26
PMID 15157284
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The adequacy of association studies for complex diseases depends critically on the existence of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between functional alleles and surrounding SNP markers.

Results: We examined the patterns of LD and haplotype distribution in eight candidate genes for osteoporosis and/or obesity using 31 SNPs in 1,873 subjects. These eight genes are apolipoprotein E (APOE), type I collagen alpha1 (COL1A1), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha), leptin receptor (LEPR), parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide receptor type 1 (PTHR1), transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3), and vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptor (VDR). Yin yang haplotypes, two high-frequency haplotypes composed of completely mismatching SNP alleles, were examined. To quantify LD patterns, two common measures of LD, D' and r2, were calculated for the SNPs within the genes. The haplotype distribution varied in the different genes. Yin yang haplotypes were observed only in PTHR1 and UCP3. D' ranged from 0.020 to 1.000 with the average of 0.475, whereas the average r2 was 0.158 (ranging from 0.000 to 0.883). A decay of LD was observed as the intermarker distance increased, however, there was a great difference in LD characteristics of different genes or even in different regions within gene.

Conclusion: The differences in haplotype distributions and LD patterns among the genes underscore the importance of characterizing genomic regions of interest prior to association studies.

Citing Articles

Genome-wide association study for cashmere traits in Inner Mongolia cashmere goat population reveals new candidate genes and haplotypes.

Rong Y, Wang X, Na Q, Ao X, Xia Q, Guo F BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):658.

PMID: 38956486 PMC: 11218406. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10543-4.


Utilising SNP Association Analysis as a Prospective Approach for Personalising Androgenetic Alopecia Treatment.

Frances M, Vila-Vecilla L, Russo V, Polonini H, de Souza G Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(4):971-981.

PMID: 38555553 PMC: 11052732. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01142-y.


Identification, analysis of deleterious SNPs of the human GSR gene and their effects on the structure and functions of associated proteins and other diseases.

Vyas B, Bhowmik R, Akhter M, Ahmad F Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):5474.

PMID: 35361806 PMC: 8971378. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09295-6.


The GWAS Analysis of Body Size and Population Verification of Related SNPs in Hu Sheep.

Jiang J, Cao Y, Shan H, Wu J, Song X, Jiang Y Front Genet. 2021; 12:642552.

PMID: 34093644 PMC: 8173124. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.642552.


Association of transforming growth factor-β1 gene variants with risk of coal workers' pneumoconiosis.

Qian H, Song Z, Wang M, Jia X, Li A, Yang Y J Biomed Res. 2013; 24(4):270-6.

PMID: 23554640 PMC: 3596592. DOI: 10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60038-3.


References
1.
Chagnon Y, Rankinen T, Snyder E, Weisnagel S, Perusse L, Bouchard C . The human obesity gene map: the 2002 update. Obes Res. 2003; 11(3):313-67. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.47. View

2.
Kruglyak L, Daly M, Lander E . Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996; 58(6):1347-63. PMC: 1915045. View

3.
Stephens J, Schneider J, Tanguay D, Choi J, Acharya T, Stanley S . Haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in 313 human genes. Science. 2001; 293(5529):489-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.1059431. View

4.
Weiss K, Clark A . Linkage disequilibrium and the mapping of complex human traits. Trends Genet. 2001; 18(1):19-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02550-1. View

5.
Albagha O, Tasker P, McGuigan F, Reid D, Ralston S . Linkage disequilibrium between polymorphisms in the human TNFRSF1B gene and their association with bone mass in perimenopausal women. Hum Mol Genet. 2002; 11(19):2289-95. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.19.2289. View