» Articles » PMID: 15153302

Saccharomyces Genome Database: Underlying Principles and Organisation

Abstract

A scientific database can be a powerful tool for biologists in an era where large-scale genomic analysis, combined with smaller-scale scientific results, provides new insights into the roles of genes and their products in the cell. However, the collection and assimilation of data is, in itself, not enough to make a database useful. The data must be incorporated into the database and presented to the user in an intuitive and biologically significant manner. Most importantly, this presentation must be driven by the user's point of view; that is, from a biological perspective. The success of a scientific database can therefore be measured by the response of its users - statistically, by usage numbers and, in a less quantifiable way, by its relationship with the community it serves and its ability to serve as a model for similar projects. Since its inception ten years ago, the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) has seen a dramatic increase in its usage, has developed and maintained a positive working relationship with the yeast research community, and has served as a template for at least one other database. The success of SGD, as measured by these criteria, is due in large part to philosophies that have guided its mission and organisation since it was established in 1993. This paper aims to detail these philosophies and how they shape the organisation and presentation of the database.

Citing Articles

Centralizing neurofibromatosis experimental tool knowledge with the NF Research Tools Database.

Clayton A, DeFelice M, Zalmanek B, Hodgson J, Morin C, Simon S Database (Oxford). 2022; 2022.

PMID: 35735230 PMC: 9218993. DOI: 10.1093/database/baac045.


New data and collaborations at the Saccharomyces Genome Database: updated reference genome, alleles, and the Alliance of Genome Resources.

Engel S, Wong E, Nash R, Aleksander S, Alexander M, Douglass E Genetics. 2021; 220(4).

PMID: 34897464 PMC: 9209811. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab224.


Exploiting mitochondrial and metabolic homeostasis as a vulnerability in NF1 deficient cells.

Allaway R, Wood M, Downey S, Bouley S, Traphagen N, Wells J Oncotarget. 2018; 9(22):15860-15875.

PMID: 29662612 PMC: 5882303. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19335.


The coordinated action of the MVB pathway and autophagy ensures cell survival during starvation.

Muller M, Schmidt O, Angelova M, Faserl K, Weys S, Kremser L Elife. 2015; 4:e07736.

PMID: 25902403 PMC: 4424281. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07736.


Highly Predictive Reprogramming of tRNA Modifications Is Linked to Selective Expression of Codon-Biased Genes.

Chan C, Deng W, Li F, Demott M, Babu I, Begley T Chem Res Toxicol. 2015; 28(5):978-88.

PMID: 25772370 PMC: 4438938. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00004.


References
1.
Ashburner M, Ball C, Blake J, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry J . Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000; 25(1):25-9. PMC: 3037419. DOI: 10.1038/75556. View

2.
Heiman M, Walter P . Prm1p, a pheromone-regulated multispanning membrane protein, facilitates plasma membrane fusion during yeast mating. J Cell Biol. 2000; 151(3):719-30. PMC: 2185589. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.151.3.719. View

3.
Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander E . Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature. 2003; 423(6937):241-54. DOI: 10.1038/nature01644. View

4.
Brachat S, Dietrich F, Voegeli S, Zhang Z, Stuart L, Lerch A . Reinvestigation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome annotation by comparison to the genome of a related fungus: Ashbya gossypii. Genome Biol. 2003; 4(7):R45. PMC: 193632. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-7-r45. View

5.
Cliften P, Sudarsanam P, Desikan A, Fulton L, Fulton B, Majors J . Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science. 2003; 301(5629):71-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1084337. View