» Articles » PMID: 15150592

Survival Results of a Multicentre Phase II Study to Evaluate D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2004 May 20
PMID 15150592
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Curative resection is the treatment of choice for potentially curable gastric cancer. Two major Western studies in the 1990s failed to show a benefit from D2 dissection. They showed extremely high postoperative mortality after D2 dissection, and were criticised for the potential inadequacy of the pretrial training in the new technique of D2 dissection, prior to the phase III studies being initiated. The inclusion of pancreatectomy and splenectomy in D2 dissection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Following these results, we started a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pancreas-preserving D2 dissection. The results of this trial regarding the safety of pancreas preserving D2 dissection were published in 1998. In this paper, we present the survival results of this phase II trial to confirm the rationale of carrying out a phase III study comparing D1 vs D2 dissection for curable gastric cancer. Italian patients with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were registered in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group Multicenter trial. The study was carried out based on the General Rules of the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. A strict quality control system was achieved by a supervising surgeon of the reference centre who had stayed at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, to learn the standard D2 gastrectomy and the postoperative management. The standard procedure entailed removal of the first and second tier lymph nodes. During total gastrectomy, the pancreas was preserved according to the Maruyama technique. Complete follow-up was available to death or 5 years in 100% of patients and the median follow-up time was 4.38 years. Out of 297 consecutive patients registered, 191 patients were enrolled in the study between May 1994 and December 1996. The overall morbidity rate was 20.9%. The postoperative in-hospital mortality was 3.1%. The overall 5-year survival rate among all eligible patients was 55%. Survival was strictly related to stage, depth of wall invasion, lymph node involvement and type of gastrectomy (distal vs total). Our results suggest a survival benefit for pancreas-preserving D2 dissection in Italian patients with gastric cancer if performed in experienced centres. A phase III trial among exclusively experienced centres is urgently needed.

Citing Articles

Current standards of surgical management of gastric cancer: an appraisal.

Magyar C, Rai A, Aigner K, Jamadar P, Tsui T, Gloor B Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):78.

PMID: 36745231 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02789-5.


A nomogram to predict survival probability of gastric cancer patients undergoing radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Ma L, Chen G, Wang D, Zhang K, Zhao F, Tang J Front Oncol. 2022; 12:893998.

PMID: 35992865 PMC: 9389342. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.893998.


Complete Mesogastric Excisions Involving Anatomically Based Concepts and Embryological-Based Surgeries: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.

Girnyi S, Ekman M, Marano L, Roviello F, Polom K Curr Oncol. 2021; 28(6):4929-4937.

PMID: 34898586 PMC: 8628739. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060413.


The metastatic lymph node ratio is a better prognostic factor than the number of metastatic limph node after curative resection for gastric cancer.

Giuffrida M, Viani L, Iapichino G, Cozzani F, Dellabate P, Del Rio P Acta Biomed. 2021; 92(5):e2021284.

PMID: 34738601 PMC: 8689297. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.9682.


[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: implications for surgery].

Capovilla G, Froiio C, Lang H, Berlth F, Grimminger P Chirurg. 2021; 93(2):138-143.

PMID: 34622304 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01516-4.


References
1.
KARL R, Schreiber R, Boulware D, Baker S, Coppola D . Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2000; 231(5):635-43. PMC: 1421050. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00003. View

2.
Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Soldati T, Danese F, Calvo F . Morbidity and mortality after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group prospective multicenter surgical study. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16(4):1490-3. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1490. View

3.
Bonenkamp J, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker J . Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet. 1995; 345(8952):745-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90637-1. View

4.
Parikh D, Johnson M, Chagla L, Lowe D, McCulloch P . D2 gastrectomy: lessons from a prospective audit of the learning curve. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(11):1595-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800831134. View

5.
Lerut T, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Deneffe G, Topal B, van de Ven C . Reflections on three field lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999; 46(26):717-25. View