» Articles » PMID: 15141458

A Regional Approach to Projecting Land-use Change and Resulting Ecological Vulnerability

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2004 May 15
PMID 15141458
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explores ecological vulnerability to land-use change in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region by spatially extrapolating land and economic development, and overlaying these projections with maps of sensitive ecological resources. As individual extrapolations have a high degree of uncertainty, five methods with different theoretical bases are employed. Confidence in projections is increased for counties targeted by two or more projection methods. A county is considered at risk if it currently supports three or more sensitive resources, and is projected to experience significant growth by the year 2010 by two or more methods. Analysis designated 19 counties and two cities as at risk, highlighting within a large region the priority areas where state and regional efforts would contribute the most to integrating environmental considerations into the process of land development. The study also found that potentially severe ecological effects of future land-use change are not limited to the outskirts of major urban areas. Recreational demands on smaller communities with mountain and coastal resources are also significant, as are initiatives to promote economic development in rural areas of high ecological quality. This approach provides a comprehensive overview of potential regional development, leading to an objective prioritization of high-risk areas. The intent is to inform local planning and decision-making so that regional and cumulative ecological degradation are minimized.

Citing Articles

Reflections on a vulnerability framework for sustainability science.

Turner B, Zhou B Jamba. 2023; 15(1):1335.

PMID: 38089720 PMC: 10713497. DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1335.


Ecosystem Vulnerability Review: Proposal of an Interdisciplinary Ecosystem Assessment Approach.

Weisshuhn P, Muller F, Wiggering H Environ Manage. 2018; 61(6):904-915.

PMID: 29541799 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1023-8.


Empirically-based modeling and mapping to consider the co-occurrence of ecological receptors and stressors.

Martin R, Waits E, Nietch C Sci Total Environ. 2017; 613-614:1228-1239.

PMID: 28958130 PMC: 6092948. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.301.


The effects of land use change on environmental quality in the red soil hilly region, China: a case study in Xianning County.

Shi Z, Chen L, Hao J, Wang T, Cai C Environ Monit Assess. 2008; 150(1-4):295-306.

PMID: 18369731 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0231-8.


An overview of data integration methods for regional assessment.

Locantore N, Tran L, ONeill R, McKinnis P, Smith E, OConnell M Environ Monit Assess. 2004; 94(1-3):249-61.

PMID: 15141459 DOI: 10.1023/b:emas.0000016892.67527.4c.


References
1.
Clarke K, Gaydos L . Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2002; 12(7):699-714. DOI: 10.1080/136588198241617. View

2.
Vesterby M, Heimlich R . Land use and demographic change: results from fast-growth counties. Land Econ. 1991; 67(3):279-91. View