Middle to Lower Uterine Segment Embryo Transfer Improves Implantation and Pregnancy Rates Compared with Fundal Embryo Transfer
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To assess differences in pregnancy and implantation rates as a function of the embryo placement.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: A tertiary care center.
Subject(s): All fresh, nondonor IVF cycles performed in 2001.
Intervention(s): Alteration in embryo transfer (ET) target location from the fundal region to the middle to lower uterine segment.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rate (sonographic sac evidence/number of transfer cycles), implantation rate (number of sacs/number of embryos transferred), patient age, peak E(2), and fertilization rate.
Result(s): A total of 393 fundal and 273 lower to middle uterine segment ETs were performed. The pregnancy (PR), implantation, and birth rates were significantly higher after a middle to lower uterine segment ET compared with fundal ET (39.6% vs. 31.2%; 21% vs. 14%; and 34.1% vs. 26.2%, respectively). Groups did not differ regarding patient age, basal FSH, peak E(2), number of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, fertilization rate, embryo quality, or number of embryos transferred.
Conclusion(s): Both PR and implantation rates are favorably affected by directing embryo placement to the lower to middle uterine segment. By some unknown mechanism, it appears that this endometrial location provides a more favorable region for embryo deposition.
The impact of transferred air bubble position on clinical pregnancy rate in FET cycles.
He L, He J, Ma Q, Jin S, Lu Y, Zhang D Reprod Fertil. 2023; .
PMID: 38064285 PMC: 10831539. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-23-0053.
Effect of embryo transfer depth on IVF/ICSI outcomes: A randomized clinical trial.
Davar R, Mahsa Poormoosavi S, Mohseni F, Janati S Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020; 18(9):723-732.
PMID: 33062918 PMC: 7521168. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v13i9.7667.
Embryo migration following ART documented by 2D/3D ultrasound.
Saravelos S, Balfoussia D, Kong G, Chung J, Mak J, Chung C Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020; 12(2):143-148.
PMID: 32832929 PMC: 7431202.
Embryo placement in IVF and reproductive outcomes: a cohort analysis and review.
Santos M, Silva A, Barbosa A, Brum G, Nakagawa H, Cabral I JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019; 23(3):210-214.
PMID: 30875171 PMC: 6724395. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190003.
Singh N, Lata K, Malhotra N, Vanamail P J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017; 10(2):102-107.
PMID: 28904498 PMC: 5586082. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_54_15.