» Articles » PMID: 15125134

Inter- and Intra-measurer Error in the Measurement of Reimers' Hip Migration Percentage

Overview
Date 2004 May 6
PMID 15125134
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reimers' hip migration percentage is commonly used to document the extent of subluxation of the hip in children with spasticity. In this study, two measurers, with six months paediatric orthopaedic experience, measured the migration percentage on 44 pelvic radiographs of children with cerebral palsy, aged between two and eight years. Unknown to the measurers, each radiograph was duplicated, giving 22 non-identical radiographs (44 hips) which were measured twice at time 0 and twice six weeks later. The intra-measurer, intra-sessional absolute differences between the first and second measurements ranged from 0% to 23%, with median values of 2.5% to 3.6%. The intra-sessional median absolute differences were not statistically different between the two measurers and measuring sessions (p = 0.42, Kruskal-Wallis test). The inter-sessional absolute differences for measurements made by the same measurers ranged from 0% to 18% with a median absolute difference of 1.7% to 3.2%. Overall, only 5% of the intra-measurer measurement differences, within and between sessions, were above 13%. Repeated measurements by one measurer over time must, therefore, vary by more than 13% in order to be 95% confident of a true change. The inter-measurer error was higher with median absolute differences between the two measurers' measurements of the same hip of 3.25% to 5% (0% to 26%) and a 95th upper confidence interval of 21% to 23%. Averaging the four separate measurements over the two sessions reduced the inter-measurer error to a median absolute difference of 2.8%, but did not improve the 95th upper confidence interval, which measured 22.4%. Such inter-measurer errors may be clinically unacceptable.

Citing Articles

Longitudinal relationship between hip displacement and hip function in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: A scoping review.

Malone A, Tanner G, French H Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024; 67(4):450-462.

PMID: 39572923 PMC: 11875528. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.16175.


Prevalence and Regional Differences in Migrated Hips in Danish Children with Cerebral Palsy from 2008 to 2021-A Comparison of Ambulant vs. Non-Ambulant Children.

Bakhtiyar M, Iljazi A, Petersen M, Odgaard A, Wong C Children (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39201899 PMC: 11352901. DOI: 10.3390/children11080964.


From Hip Screening to Hip Surveillance: Transforming Care for Patients With Cerebral Palsy: An Analysis of a Single Institution.

Sadur A, Martinez C, Dance S, Travers R, Gonzalez A, Tabaie S J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023; 7(12).

PMID: 38063442 PMC: 10697633. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00236.


The Ambiguity of Names and Landmarks in Radiographs of the Pediatric Pelvis: Variations and a Historical Perspective.

Hedelin H, Larnert P, Laine T, Sansone M, Hebelka H J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023; 7(9).

PMID: 37734040 PMC: 10516389. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00120.


Measuring hip migration percentage in cerebral palsy using the HipScreen app.

Amen J, Perkins O, Cadwgan J, Cooke S, Kafchitsas K, Kokkinakis M Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(5):363-369.

PMID: 37212198 PMC: 10201458. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2023-0031.R1.