» Articles » PMID: 15124996

Computer-aided Diagnosis Scheme for Histological Classification of Clustered Microcalcifications on Magnification Mammograms

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2004 May 6
PMID 15124996
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms can be difficult, and thus often require biopsy or follow-up. Our purpose in this study was to develop a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for identifying the histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms in order to assist the radiologists' interpretation as a "second opinion." Our database consisted of 58 magnification mammograms, which included 35 malignant clustered microcalcifications (9 invasive carcinomas, 12 noninvasive carcinomas of the comedo type, and 14 noninvasive carcinomas of the noncomedo type) and 23 benign clustered microcalcifications (17 mastopathies and 6 fibroadenomas). The histological classifications of all clustered microcalcifications were proved by pathologic diagnosis. The clustered microcalcifications were first segmented by use of a novel filter bank and a thresholding technique. Five objective features on clustered microcalcifications were determined by taking into account subjective features that experienced the radiologists commonly use to identify possible histological classifications. The Bayes decision rule with five objective features was employed for distinguishing between five histological classifications. The classification accuracies for distinguishing between three malignant histological classifications were 77.8% (7/9) for invasive carcinoma, 75.0% (9/12) for noninvasive carcinoma of the comedo type, and 92.9% (13/14) for noninvasive carcinoma of the noncomedo type. The classification accuracies for distinguishing between two benign histological classifications were 94.1% (16/17) for mastopathy, and 100.0% (6/6) for fibroadenoma. This computerized method would be useful in assisting radiologists in their assessments of clustered microcalcifications.

Citing Articles

Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses on Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Bayesian Optimization.

Hizukuri A, Nakayama R, Nara M, Suzuki M, Namba K J Digit Imaging. 2020; 34(1):116-123.

PMID: 33159279 PMC: 7886934. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00394-2.


Predicting underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparison between radiomics and conventional approaches.

Li J, Song Y, Xu S, Wang J, Huang H, Ma W Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018; 14(4):709-721.

PMID: 30569330 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1900-x.


Estimating the Accuracy Level Among Individual Detections in Clustered Microcalcifications.

Sainz de Cea M, Nishikawa R, Yang Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017; 36(5):1162-1171.

PMID: 28103550 PMC: 5595422. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2654799.


Using Machine Learning to Identify Benign Cases with Non-Definitive Biopsy.

Kuusisto F, Dutra I, Nassif H, Wu Y, Klein M, Neuman H Healthcom. 2015; 2013(15th):283-285.

PMID: 26501132 PMC: 4616154. DOI: 10.1109/HealthCom.2013.6720685.


Radiological technologists' performance for the detection of malignant microcalcifications in digital mammograms without and with a computer-aided detection system.

Tanaka R, Takamori M, Uchiyama Y, Shiraishi J J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015; 2(2):024505.

PMID: 26158109 PMC: 4478841. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.024505.