» Articles » PMID: 15122930

Why Do People Need Self-esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review

Overview
Journal Psychol Bull
Specialty Psychology
Date 2004 May 5
PMID 15122930
Citations 120
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Terror management theory (TMT; J. Greenberg, T. Pyszczynski, & S. Solomon, 1986) posits that people are motivated to pursue positive self-evaluations because self-esteem provides a buffer against the omnipresent potential for anxiety engendered by the uniquely human awareness of mortality. Empirical evidence relevant to the theory is reviewed showing that high levels of self-esteem reduce anxiety and anxiety-related defensive behavior, reminders of one's mortality increase self-esteem striving and defense of self-esteem against threats in a variety of domains, high levels of self-esteem eliminate the effect of reminders of mortality on both self-esteem striving and the accessibility of death-related thoughts, and convincing people of the existence of an afterlife eliminates the effect of mortality salience on self-esteem striving. TMT is compared with other explanations for why people need self-esteem, and a critique of the most prominent of these, sociometer theory, is provided.

Citing Articles

Death and beauty: mortality salience and creatureliness increase self-objectification not only in females but also in males.

Gao Y, Lu K, Ni Y, Shen Y Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1512704.

PMID: 40051403 PMC: 11882579. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1512704.


Training the embodied self in its impermanence: meditators evidence neurophysiological markers of death acceptance.

Dor-Ziderman Y, Schweitzer Y, Nave O, Trautwein F, Fulder S, Lutz A Neurosci Conscious. 2025; 2025(1):niaf002.

PMID: 40041745 PMC: 11879107. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niaf002.


Validation of the death reflection scale among older people.

Richter L Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1541516.

PMID: 40008343 PMC: 11850538. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541516.


Meta-analytic prospective associations between self-esteem and eating disorders appear to be spurious: a reanalysis and comment on Krauss et al. (2023).

Sorjonen K, Ghaderi A, Melin B Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1463701.

PMID: 39989636 PMC: 11842458. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1463701.


Exploring the role of psychological flexibility in relationship functioning among couples coping with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study.

Ma H, Cariola L, Gillanders D Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(3):186.

PMID: 39939447 PMC: 11821681. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09229-8.