» Articles » PMID: 15097230

The Influence of Low Job Control on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Perceived Stress over the Working Day in Men and Women from the Whitehall II Cohort

Overview
Journal J Hypertens
Date 2004 Apr 21
PMID 15097230
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Work stress contributes to risk of coronary heart disease and hypertension. This study tested the influence of job control on ambulatory blood pressure, and ratings of perceived stress and happiness in men and women systematically sampled by socio-economic status from the Whitehall II epidemiological cohort.

Participants: A total of 227 men and women aged 47-59 years sampled from higher, intermediate and lower employment grades.

Outcome Measures: Ambulatory blood pressure and ratings of stress, perceived control and happiness.

Methods: Participants completed standard measures of job demands and job control, and undertook ambulatory monitoring with measures of blood pressure and subjective state every 20 min from early in the working day until going to bed.

Results: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were greater in participants reporting low rather than high job control (means 125.7/81.5 versus 122.4/78.6 mmHg, P < 0.05), independently of gender, employment grade, body mass index, age, smoking status, and physical activity. Differences persisted into the evening after work. Job demands and job strain (high demand/low control) were not associated with blood pressure. Participants reporting low job control experienced stress more frequently over the working day than did those with high job control. Higher socio-economic status participants and women were more stressed by low job control than were men and people of lower socio-economic status.

Conclusions: Job control plays an important role in modulating cardiovascular and affective responses over the working day, and these responses may contribute to increased cardiovascular disease risk.

Citing Articles

Gender-specific perception of job stressors and resources: a structural equation model-based secondary analysis.

Heub A, Schaller A, Lange M Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1463868.

PMID: 39735767 PMC: 11671497. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463868.


Stress induced proinflammatory adaptations: Plausible mechanisms for the link between stress and cardiovascular disease.

Slusher A, Acevedo E Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1124121.

PMID: 37007994 PMC: 10065149. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1124121.


Aging on the Job? The Association Between Occupational Characteristics and Accelerated Biological Aging.

Andrasfay T, Kim J, Ailshire J, Crimmins E J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023; 78(7):1236-1245.

PMID: 37004243 PMC: 10292835. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbad055.


Autonomy in the context of cognitive demands-is the resource becoming a stressor?.

Zolg S, Herbig B Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023; 96(5):685-714.

PMID: 36929278 PMC: 10219893. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-023-01966-9.


Perceived social support and ambulatory blood pressure during daily life: a meta-analysis.

Uchino B, Baucom B, Landvatter J, de Grey R, Tacana T, Flores M J Behav Med. 2022; 45(4):509-517.

PMID: 35034219 PMC: 9283536. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-021-00273-3.