» Articles » PMID: 15090354

3-T Imaging of the Cochlear Nerve and Labyrinth in Cochlear-implant Candidates: 3D Fast Recovery Fast Spin-echo Versus 3D Constructive Interference in the Steady State Techniques

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2004 Apr 20
PMID 15090354
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: High-resolution imaging of the internal auditory canal and labyrinth at 1.5 T is often performed by using three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo or T2* techniques. We evaluated both techniques at 3 T in the preoperative assessment of patients being considered for cochlear implants.

Methods: Sagittal 3D fast recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) and 3D constructive interference in the steady state (CISS) images were acquired in eight patients at 3.0 T by using dual surface coils. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for the intracanalicular nerve and CSF were measured in the internal auditory canal. Two neuroradiologists reviewed the images to determine whether the techniques provided images of diagnostic quality.

Results: CNRs for 3D CISS were twice those obtained with 3D FRFSE. Both techniques provided images of diagnostic quality, though spurious signal intensity loss at the apex of the superior semicircular canals was encountered on 3D FRFSE images in four of eight patients.

Conclusion: Both 3D FRFSE and 3D CISS provide high-resolution images of the internal auditory canal and labyrinth at 3.0 T. We predict that the superior CNRs obtained with 3D CISS will prove advantageous as we move to smaller fields of view at higher field strength.

Citing Articles

Morphology of the human inner ear and vestibulocochlear nerve assessed using 7 T MRI.

Aphiwatthanasumet K, Jethwa K, Glover P, ODonoghue G, Auer D, Gowland P MAGMA. 2024; 38(1):121-130.

PMID: 39535680 PMC: 11790716. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01213-3.


Dynamic micro-optical coherence tomography enables structural and metabolic imaging of the mammalian cochlea.

Schulz-Hildebrandt H, Spasic S, Hou F, Ting K, Batts S, Tearney G Front Mol Neurosci. 2024; 17:1436837.

PMID: 39449964 PMC: 11499234. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1436837.


Magnetic resonance imaging of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison between constructive interference steady-state and small field-of-view technique turbo spin echo sequences.

Vitale V, Varotto A, Cracco I, Mansour M, Di Clemente L, Raneri F Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024; 64(Suppl 1):123-130.

PMID: 38985167 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01334-9.


Imaging Update of Congenital Hearing Loss: A Recent Insight Imaging Including 3D MRI Cisternography Prior to Cochlear Implant.

Osman N, Abdel Aziz A, Mohsen L, Badry M, Abdelkader R, AbdelMonem M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(2):1747-1754.

PMID: 38566686 PMC: 10982224. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04397-7.


Patterns of Signal Intensity in CISS MRI of the Inner Ear and Eye.

Mair A, Song C, Buki B, Ward B Tomography. 2024; 10(2):203-214.

PMID: 38393284 PMC: 10893097. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10020016.


References
1.
Lo W . Imaging of cochlear and auditory brain stem implantation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998; 19(6):1147-54. PMC: 8338650. View

2.
Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Aoki I, Ninomiya A . Fast recovery 3D fast spin-echo MR imaging of the inner ear at 3 T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23(2):299-302. PMC: 7975244. View

3.
Schmalbrock P . Comparison of three-dimensional fast spin echo and gradient echo sequences for high-resolution temporal bone imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 12(6):814-25. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<814::aid-jmri4>3.0.co;2-l. View

4.
Kocharian A, Lane J, Bernstein M, Lin C, Witte R, Huston 3rd J . Hybrid phased array for improved internal auditory canal imaging at 3.0-T MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 16(3):300-4. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10165. View

5.
Stone J, Chakeres D, Schmalbrock P . High-resolution MR imaging of the auditory pathway. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1998; 6(1):195-217. View