Vitamin C Pharmacokinetics: Implications for Oral and Intravenous Use
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Vitamin C at high concentrations is toxic to cancer cells in vitro. Early clinical studies of vitamin C in patients with terminal cancer suggested clinical benefit, but 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials showed none. However, these studies used different routes of administration.
Objective: To determine whether plasma vitamin C concentrations vary substantially with the route of administration.
Design: Dose concentration studies and pharmacokinetic modeling.
Setting: Academic medical center.
Participants: 17 healthy hospitalized volunteers.
Measurements: Vitamin C plasma and urine concentrations were measured after administration of oral and intravenous doses at a dose range of 0.015 to 1.25 g, and plasma concentrations were calculated for a dose range of 1 to 100 g.
Results: Peak plasma vitamin C concentrations were higher after administration of intravenous doses than after administration of oral doses (P < 0.001), and the difference increased according to dose. Vitamin C at a dose of 1.25 g administered orally produced mean (+/-sd) peak plasma concentrations of 134.8 +/- 20.6 micromol/L compared with 885 +/- 201.2 micromol/L for intravenous administration. For the maximum tolerated oral dose of 3 g every 4 hours, pharmacokinetic modeling predicted peak plasma vitamin C concentrations of 220 micromol/L and 13 400 micromol/L for a 50-g intravenous dose. Peak predicted urine concentrations of vitamin C from intravenous administration were 140-fold higher than those from maximum oral doses.
Limitations: Patient data are not available to confirm pharmacokinetic modeling at high doses and in patients with cancer.
Conclusions: Oral vitamin C produces plasma concentrations that are tightly controlled. Only intravenous administration of vitamin C produces high plasma and urine concentrations that might have antitumor activity. Because efficacy of vitamin C treatment cannot be judged from clinical trials that use only oral dosing, the role of vitamin C in cancer treatment should be reevaluated.
Calder P, Kreider R, McKay D Nutrients. 2025; 17(2).
PMID: 39861409 PMC: 11767823. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020279.
Sanduzzi Zamparelli S, Sanduzzi Zamparelli A, Bocchino M Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).
PMID: 39860053 PMC: 11766556. DOI: 10.3390/life15010113.
The therapeutic potential of vitamins A, C, and D in pancreatic cancer.
Piotrowsky A, Burkard M, Schmieder H, Venturelli S, Renner O, Marongiu L Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41598.
PMID: 39850424 PMC: 11754517. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41598.
Chen P, Lamson D, Anderson P, Drisko J, Chen Q Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024; 18:11795549241283421.
PMID: 39493360 PMC: 11528587. DOI: 10.1177/11795549241283421.
Aminullah Y, Naftali Z, Santosa D, Prajoko Y, Azam M, Susanto H Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(10):3741-3748.
PMID: 39487992 PMC: 11711335. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.10.3741.