» Articles » PMID: 15067272

The Long-term Evaluation of Lateral Meniscus Tears Left in Situ at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2004 Apr 7
PMID 15067272
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to determine the long-term subjective and objective results for patients with lateral meniscus tears found at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction that were left in situ or abraded and trephined but not repaired or removed.

Type Of Study: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

Methods: From a database of ACL reconstruction patients, 332 patients were noted to have lateral meniscus tears that were left in situ or underwent abrasion and trephination. Exclusion criteria included lateral or medial partial meniscectomy, previous knee surgery, or greater than grade II chondromalacia in any knee compartment. The tears were classified as posterior horn tears (n = 70), stable radial flap tears (n = 50), or peripheral or posterior tears (n = 212). Patients were evaluated subjectively using a modified Noyes knee questionnaire and objectively using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) criteria.

Results: At a mean of 6.6 years (range, 2 to 16.5 years) after surgery, the mean total modified Noyes score for 239 patients was 93.8 +/- 7.6 points. At a mean of 5.1 +/- 3.8 years after surgery, the objective IKDC evaluation showed that 163 of 170 (96%) patients had an overall rating of normal or nearly normal. Radiographic evaluation showed that 162 patients (95%) had a normal rating, 6 patients had a nearly normal rating and 2 patients had an abnormal rating. Of 332 patients, only 8 (2.4%) required subsequent surgery for the lateral meniscus.

Conclusions: Lateral meniscus tears that are posterior horn tears, stable radial flap tears, or peripheral or posterior third tears that do not extend further than 1 cm in front of the popliteus tendon can be treated successfully with abrasion and trephination or by being left in situ.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Citing Articles

Meniscus Tears in Elite Athletes: Treatment Considerations, Clinical Outcomes, and Return to Play.

Marigi E, Davies M, Marx R, Rodeo S, Williams 3rd R Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024; 17(8):313-320.

PMID: 38833135 PMC: 11219605. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09907-w.


Differences in postoperative knee function based on concomitant treatment of lateral meniscal injury in the setting of primary ACL reconstruction.

Kaarre J, Herman Z, Persson F, Wallgren J, Alentorn-Geli E, Hamrin Senorski E BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):737.

PMID: 37715148 PMC: 10503181. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06867-z.


Effect of Concomitant Lateral Meniscal Management on ACL Reconstruction Revision Rate and Secondary Meniscal and Cartilaginous Injuries.

Persson F, Kaarre J, Herman Z, Wallgren J, Hamrin Senorski E, Musahl V Am J Sports Med. 2023; 51(12):3142-3148.

PMID: 37681530 PMC: 10543953. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231194624.


Searching for the Best Treatment for Ramp Lesions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Marin F, Soto J, Barahona M, Negrin R Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41651.

PMID: 37435014 PMC: 10332486. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41651.


Arthroscopic Bone Graft Technique for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Welder E, Magnussen R, Fitzpatrick S, Duerr R, Kaeding C, Flanigan D Arthrosc Tech. 2022; 11(10):e1667-e1674.

PMID: 36311315 PMC: 9596458. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.05.014.