» Articles » PMID: 15062127

Radiography-based Treatment Planning Compared with Computed Tomography (CT)-based Treatment Planning for Intracavitary Brachytherapy in Cancer of the Cervix: Analysis of Dose-volume Histograms

Overview
Journal Brachytherapy
Specialty Radiology
Date 2004 Apr 6
PMID 15062127
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the tumor volume and organs at risk by CT-based treatment planning compared with conventional radiography-based treatment planning for intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix.

Methods And Materials: Fifteen consecutive patients with cancer of the cervix (1 IB1, 3 IB2, 7 IIB, 4 IIIB) were treated with plastic CT-compatible HDR intracavitary applicators and underwent postimplant pelvic CT scans with applicators in place. CT-images were transferred to the PLATO treatment planning system. The gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs at risk were digitized. Dwell positions in the uterine tandem and colpostats were identified and registered for each patient. All patients were treated with 6 Gy per fraction to Point A using radiography-based planning. For the CT-based planning, DVHs were performed for the GTV, bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon, and small bowel in the pelvis. The dose delivered to 3% volume of the organs at risk (D3%) was compared with the respective ICRU reference doses.

Results: For stage IB(I), IB2, IIB, and IIIB disease the mean GTV was 20.5 cc, 56.6 cc (54.2-57.2), 63.7 cc (55.4-118.9), and 77.6 cc (49.4-102.9), respectively. The 6 Gy pear-shaped volume (PSV) encompassed an average GTV of 98.5%, 89.5%, 79.5%, and 59.5% for stages IBI, IB2, IIB, and IIIB, respectively. The mean dose for the ICRU bladder point and D3% was 3.72 Gy (1.51-5.53) and 4.74 Gy (1.70-10.10), respectively. The mean dose for the ICRU rectal point and D3% was 3.97 Gy (2.09-5.37) and 3.52 Gy (2.05-4.08), respectively. The D3% for the sigmoid colon was highest (3.88 Gy), followed by the rectum (3.52 Gy), and the small bowel (3.36 Gy).

Conclusion: Radiography-based conventional treatment planning overestimates tumor dose, especially those with more advanced tumors. To correlate DVHs for tumor control, improved tumor imaging is necessary.

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of 60Co and 192Ir Sources in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer.

Wen A, Wang X, Wang B, Yan C, Luo J, Wang P Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(19).

PMID: 36230672 PMC: 9563337. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194749.


Outcomes of patients with cervical cancer treated with low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy after concurrent chemoradiation.

Scott A, Yarney J, Vanderpuye V, Aidoo C, Agyeman M, Boateng S Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021; 31(5):670-678.

PMID: 33558421 PMC: 8108283. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002120.


Imaging-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: the main process and common techniques.

Liu Z, Zhao Y, Li Y, Sun J, Lin X, Wang T Am J Cancer Res. 2021; 10(12):4165-4177.

PMID: 33414993 PMC: 7783772.


Evaluation of Volumetric Doses of Organs at Risk in Carcinoma Cervix Patients with HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy and Comparison of CT-based and Conventional Plans.

Srivastava S, Painuly N, Mishra S, Srivastava K, Singh N, Singh S J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020; 9(6):603-612.

PMID: 32039090 PMC: 6943852. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.867.


Dosimetric evaluation of Point A and volume-based high-dose-rate plans: a single institution study on adaptive brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer.

Paul A, Nalichowski A, Abrams J, Paximadis P, Zhuang L, Miller S J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018; 10(3):202-210.

PMID: 30038639 PMC: 6052381. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76782.