» Articles » PMID: 15020490

Selection, Subdivision and Extinction and Recolonization

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Mar 17
PMID 15020490
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a subdivided population, the interaction between natural selection and stochastic change in allele frequency is affected by the occurrence of local extinction and subsequent recolonization. The relative importance of selection can be diminished by this additional source of stochastic change in allele frequency. Results are presented for subdivided populations with extinction and recolonization where there is more than one founding allele after extinction, where these may tend to come from the same source deme, where the number of founding alleles is variable or the founders make unequal contributions, and where there is dominance for fitness or local frequency dependence. The behavior of a selected allele in a subdivided population is in all these situations approximately the same as that of an allele with different selection parameters in an unstructured population with a different size. The magnitude of the quantity N(e)s(e), which determines fixation probability in the case of genic selection, is always decreased by extinction and recolonization, so that deleterious alleles are more likely to fix and advantageous alleles less likely to do so. The importance of dominance or frequency dependence is also altered by extinction and recolonization. Computer simulations confirm that the theoretical predictions of both fixation probabilities and mean times to fixation are good approximations.

Citing Articles

Connectivity enhances resilience of marine forests after an extreme event.

Vranken S, Wernberg T, Scheben A, Pessarrodona A, Batley J, Coleman M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5019.

PMID: 39934205 PMC: 11814082. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87449-y.


Simulating the spread of selection-driven genotypes using landscape resistance models for desert bighorn sheep.

Creech T, Epps C, Landguth E, Wehausen J, Crowhurst R, Holton B PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0176960.

PMID: 28464013 PMC: 5413035. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176960.


The fixation probability of beneficial mutations.

Patwa Z, Wahl L J R Soc Interface. 2008; 5(28):1279-89.

PMID: 18664425 PMC: 2607448. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0248.


Quasi-species evolution in subdivided populations favours maximally deleterious mutations.

OFallon B, Adler F, Proulx S Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1629):3159-64.

PMID: 17939983 PMC: 2293948. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1228.


Evolution of coadaptation in a subdivided population.

Takahasi K Genetics. 2007; 176(1):501-11.

PMID: 17409093 PMC: 1893032. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.063636.


References
1.
Slatkin M . Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol. 1977; 12(3):253-62. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90045-4. View

2.
Whitlock M, Barton N . The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics. 1997; 146(1):427-41. PMC: 1207958. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.427. View

3.
Maruyama T . On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1970; 15(2):221-5. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300001543. View

4.
Kimura M, Ohta T . The Average Number of Generations until Fixation of a Mutant Gene in a Finite Population. Genetics. 1969; 61(3):763-71. PMC: 1212239. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/61.3.763. View

5.
Dobzhansky T, Wright S . Genetics of Natural Populations. V. Relations between Mutation Rate and Accumulation of Lethals in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1941; 26(1):23-51. PMC: 1209120. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/26.1.23. View