» Articles » PMID: 15009409

Survival of Enterococcus Faecalis in Infected Dentinal Tubules After Root Canal Filling with Different Root Canal Sealers in Vitro

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2004 Mar 11
PMID 15009409
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To investigate the ability of different endodontic sealers and calcium hydroxide to kill bacteria in experimentally infected dentinal tubules.

Methodology: Fifty-six human root segments were enlarged to size 2 (ISO size 090) Largo Peeso Reamer. After treatment with 17% EDTA and 5% NaOCl for 4 min each, the specimens were infected with Enterococcus faecalis for 3 weeks. The roots were divided into eight groups and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus (AH); Grossman's sealer (GS); Ketac-Endo (KE); Apexit (AP); RoekoSeal Automix (RSA); or RoekoSeal Automix with an experimental primer (RP), or calcium hydroxide (CH) only. One group of specimens was left unfilled for control (CT). Following storage in humid conditions at 37 degrees C for 7 days, the root canals were re-established with new sterile Largo size 2. Dentine samples from each canal were then collected using a sterile size 5 (ISO size 150) Largo Peeso Reamer. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was determined for each sample.

Results: The mean log10 CFU in all test groups was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that in the CT group. Root filling with AH and GS killed bacteria (mean CFU = 0) in the dentinal tubules. The mean log10 CFU for the CH group (0.53) was lower than that of RSA, AP, RP and KE (1.36, 1.40, 1.46 and 1.94, respectively), but only the difference between the CH and the KE groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Root fillings in vitro with gutta-percha and AH or GS were effective in killing E. faecalis in dentinal tubules. Other endodontic sealers, as well as CH, were less effective.

Citing Articles

In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers.

Mokhtari F, Modaresi J, Salmasi A, Khamisi N, Zandi H, Lesani K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1488.

PMID: 39696293 PMC: 11658299. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05192-8.


Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.

Fristad I, Haug S, Bardsen A Biomater Investig Dent. 2024; 11:40863.

PMID: 38903777 PMC: 11187977. DOI: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863.


Antibacterial activity of root canal sealers against established monospecies biofilm: An study.

Gupta R, Sharma D, Mathur M, Pooja B, Bishnoi R J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 26(5):569-573.

PMID: 38292367 PMC: 10823963. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_37_23.


Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of an Epoxy Resin-Based Endodontic Sealer Containing Nanoparticles Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.

Ibrahim B, Al-Huwaizi H Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:8717655.

PMID: 38090531 PMC: 10715854. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8717655.


Antimicrobial FiteBac® K21 promotes antimicrobial Potency and wound healing.

Bapat R, Libat R, Yuin O, Parolia A, Ilyas M, Khan A Heliyon. 2023; 9(8):e19282.

PMID: 37664740 PMC: 10469996. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19282.