» Articles » PMID: 15008934

Neuromuscular Coordination of Masticatory Muscles in Subjects with Two Types of Implant-supported Prostheses

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2004 Mar 11
PMID 15008934
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare the electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of masticatory muscles in patients with fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant overdentures.

Material And Methods: Nineteen subjects aged 45-79 years were examined. Fourteen were edentulous and had been successfully rehabilitated with (a) maxillary and mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses (seven patients); (b) mandibular implant overdentures and maxillary complete dentures (seven patients). Five control subjects had natural dentition or single/partial (no more than two teeth) tooth or implant fixed dentures. Surface EMG of the masseter and temporal muscles was performed during unilateral gum chewing and during maximum teeth clenching. To reduce biological and instrumental noise, all values were standardized as percentage of a maximum clenching on cotton rolls.

Results: During clenching, temporal muscle symmetry was larger in control subjects and fixed implant-supported prosthesis patients than in overdenture patients (analysis of variance, P=0.005). No differences were found in masseter muscle symmetry or in muscular torque. Muscle activities (integrated areas of the EMG potentials over time) were significantly larger in control subjects than in implant-supported prosthesis patients (P=0.014). In both patient groups, a poor neuromuscular coordination during chewing, with altered muscular patterns, and a smaller left-right symmetry than in control subjects were found (P=0.05). No differences in masticatory frequency were found.

Conclusion: Surface EMG analysis of clenching and chewing showed that fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant overdentures were functionally equivalent. Neuromuscular coordination during chewing was inferior to that found in subjects with natural dentition.

Citing Articles

Influence of edentulism on the structure and function of temporomandibular joint.

Zheng H, Shi L, Lu H, Liu Z, Yu M, Wang Y Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20307.

PMID: 37829806 PMC: 10565695. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20307.


Electromyographic Evaluation of Muscle Activity in Patients Rehabilitated with Full Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses.

Mostovei M, Solomon O, Chele N, Sinescu C, Duma V, Mostovei A Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(2).

PMID: 36837500 PMC: 9964024. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020299.


Electromyographic Analysis of Masticatory and Accessory Muscles in Subjects With Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses: A Three-Arm Comparative Clinical Study.

Raaj V, Raina S, Raina R, Abhishek , Kumari M, Anusha Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e33969.

PMID: 36812127 PMC: 9938720. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33969.


The Thermal Influence of Oral Rehabilitation on the Cranio-Cervico-Mandibular Complex: A Thermographic Analysis.

Moreira A, Batista R, Oliveira S, Mendes J, Sampaio-Fernandes M, Figueiral M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(19).

PMID: 34639742 PMC: 8508334. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910441.


Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals.

Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, Bhatnagar A, Kumar V J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020; 20(3):312-320.

PMID: 33223702 PMC: 7654204. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19.