Pain, Quality of Life and Complications Following the Radical Resection of Rectovaginal Endometriosis
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To determine the long term response, quality of life and levels of pain following the radical excision of rectovaginal endometriosis.
Design: A cohort study.
Setting: A tertiary referral centre for the management of advanced endometriosis.
Sample: All patients who had undergone radical resection.
Methods: Case note review and patient questionnaire.
Main Outcome Measures: Surgical complications. Overall improvement. Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, dyschezia and chronic pain were measured using a visual analogue scale. Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire.
Results: Twelve radical resections were performed by laparotomy, 48 by laparoscopy. Ten patients had a hysterectomy. Forty-eight patients underwent shaving of the pre-rectal fascia, two had a disc resection of the rectum, 10 had an anterior rectal resection. Two patients required a colostomy and two needed subsequent dilation of a stenosed anastomosis. Forty-four of the first 46 patients replied. The median follow up period was 12 months (range 2 to 22 months) and 86% (38/44) reported an improvement or whom 27 (61%) had a good response (pain completely gone or greatly improved). Patients having a hysterectomy or a disc or segmental resection of the rectum reported a good response and had a normal quality of life. Quality of life scores in the study group overall were lower than the background population.
Conclusions: Radical resection is an effective treatment for rectovaginal endometriosis. Hysterectomy and rectal resection were associated with a better response and quality of life.
Total or Subtotal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Review.
Alkatout I, Mazidimoradi A, Gunther V, Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).
PMID: 37297893 PMC: 10253360. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113697.
Safe multidisciplinary approach in deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE): is it feasible?.
Avila I, Costa L, Soto Jr M, Filogonio I, Carneiro M JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022; 18(4):139-143.
PMID: 35761742 PMC: 9239420. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140020.
Ball E, Karavadra B, Kremer-Yeatman B, Mustard C, Lee K, Bhogal S Reprod Fertil. 2022; 2(1):69-80.
PMID: 35128434 PMC: 8812445. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-20-0057.
Gibbons T, Georgiou E, Cheong Y, Wise M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 12:CD005072.
PMID: 34928503 PMC: 8686684. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005072.pub4.
Abdalla-Ribeiro H, Maekawa M, Lima R, de Nicola A, Rodrigues F, Ribeiro P PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0247654.
PMID: 33857130 PMC: 8049285. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247654.