» Articles » PMID: 15008772

Pain, Quality of Life and Complications Following the Radical Resection of Rectovaginal Endometriosis

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2004 Mar 11
PMID 15008772
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the long term response, quality of life and levels of pain following the radical excision of rectovaginal endometriosis.

Design: A cohort study.

Setting: A tertiary referral centre for the management of advanced endometriosis.

Sample: All patients who had undergone radical resection.

Methods: Case note review and patient questionnaire.

Main Outcome Measures: Surgical complications. Overall improvement. Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, dyschezia and chronic pain were measured using a visual analogue scale. Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D questionnaire.

Results: Twelve radical resections were performed by laparotomy, 48 by laparoscopy. Ten patients had a hysterectomy. Forty-eight patients underwent shaving of the pre-rectal fascia, two had a disc resection of the rectum, 10 had an anterior rectal resection. Two patients required a colostomy and two needed subsequent dilation of a stenosed anastomosis. Forty-four of the first 46 patients replied. The median follow up period was 12 months (range 2 to 22 months) and 86% (38/44) reported an improvement or whom 27 (61%) had a good response (pain completely gone or greatly improved). Patients having a hysterectomy or a disc or segmental resection of the rectum reported a good response and had a normal quality of life. Quality of life scores in the study group overall were lower than the background population.

Conclusions: Radical resection is an effective treatment for rectovaginal endometriosis. Hysterectomy and rectal resection were associated with a better response and quality of life.

Citing Articles

Total or Subtotal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Endometriosis: A Review.

Alkatout I, Mazidimoradi A, Gunther V, Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37297893 PMC: 10253360. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113697.


Safe multidisciplinary approach in deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE): is it feasible?.

Avila I, Costa L, Soto Jr M, Filogonio I, Carneiro M JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022; 18(4):139-143.

PMID: 35761742 PMC: 9239420. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140020.


Systematic review of patient-specific pre-operative predictors of pain improvement to endometriosis surgery.

Ball E, Karavadra B, Kremer-Yeatman B, Mustard C, Lee K, Bhogal S Reprod Fertil. 2022; 2(1):69-80.

PMID: 35128434 PMC: 8812445. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-20-0057.


Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery.

Gibbons T, Georgiou E, Cheong Y, Wise M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 12:CD005072.

PMID: 34928503 PMC: 8686684. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005072.pub4.


Intestinal endometriotic nodules with a length greater than 2.25 cm and affecting more than 27% of the circumference are more likely to undergo segmental resection, rather than linear nodulectomy.

Abdalla-Ribeiro H, Maekawa M, Lima R, de Nicola A, Rodrigues F, Ribeiro P PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0247654.

PMID: 33857130 PMC: 8049285. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247654.