» Articles » PMID: 14994883

The Effects of Early Headgear Treatment on Dental Arches and Craniofacial Morphology: a Report of a 2 Year Randomized Study

Overview
Journal Eur J Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2004 Mar 5
PMID 14994883
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial morphology in children in the early mixed dentition. The total study group comprised 68 children of both sexes (40 boys and 28 girls) aged 7.6 years [standard deviation (SD) 0.3]. The children, who had a Class II tendency in occlusion and moderate crowding of the dental arches, were randomly divided into two groups of equal size, matched according to gender. In the headgear (HG) group, treatment was initiated immediately. The mean treatment time was 16 months. In the second group, which served as the control, only interceptive procedures were performed during the follow-up period. The records, which included dental casts and lateral cephalograms, were obtained after follow-up periods of 1 and 2 years. The lengths and the widths of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches were significantly increased in the HG group after the 2 year follow-up period. The mean increase in lower arch length and width was 2.4 mm (SD 1.7) and 2.2 mm (SD 1.2), respectively. On average, the space gain in the lower arch was half that of the upper arch. No significant changes were found in the arch dimensions of the control group. Maxillary growth restraint and labial tilting of the incisors were the most significant cephalometric findings in the HG group when compared with the controls. The use of headgear in the early mixed dentition is effective in the treatment of moderate crowding. It is noteworthy that significant space gain in the dimensions of the lower arch can be achieved by headgear application to the upper first molars.

Citing Articles

Effects of headgear timing on dental arch changes from 7 to 18 years of age: a follow-up study.

Hannula M, Tolvanen M, Pirttiniemi P, Pirila-Parkkinen K, Julku J Eur J Orthod. 2023; 45(5):496-504.

PMID: 37607275 PMC: 10505689. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjad045.


Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Using Two-Step Retraction With Transpalatal Arches Versus En-Masse Retraction With Mini-implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mousa M, Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer M Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e33524.

PMID: 36636520 PMC: 9831618. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33524.


Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.

Turner S, Harrison J, Sharif F, Owens D, Millett D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 12:CD003453.

PMID: 34970995 PMC: 8786262. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2.


Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy.

Talvitie T, Helminen M, Karsila S, Pirttiniemi P, Signorelli L, Varho R Eur J Orthod. 2021; 44(2):146-154.

PMID: 34369566 PMC: 10084716. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjab051.


Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear.

Braga Santos S, Araujo T, Vogel C, Oliveira M, Bittencourt M, Braga E J Orofac Orthop. 2021; 82(6):382-390.

PMID: 33929557 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-020-00277-9.