Comparison on Pore Development of Activated Carbon Produced from Palm Shell and Coconut Shell
Overview
Affiliations
A series of experiments were conducted to compare the pore development in palm-shell and coconut-shell-based activated carbons produced under identical experimental conditions. Carbonization and activation processes were carried out at 850 degrees C using a fluidized bed reactor. Within the range of burn-off studied, at any burn-off, the micropore and mesopore volumes created in palm-shell-based activated carbon were always higher than those of coconut-shell-based activated carbon. On macropore volume, for palm-shell-based activated carbon, the volume increased with increase in burn-off up to 30% and then decreased. However, for coconut-shell-based activated carbon, the change in macropore volume with burn-off was almost negligible but the absolute macropore volume decreased with burn-off.
Mesoporous activated carbon yielded from pre-leached cassava peels.
Kayiwa R, Kasedde H, Lubwama M, Kirabira J Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 8(1):53.
PMID: 38650239 PMC: 10991969. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-021-00407-0.
Nisa Z, Chuan L, Guan B, Ahmad F, Ayub S Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(8).
PMID: 37111998 PMC: 10145196. DOI: 10.3390/polym15081851.
Nunes I, Schnorr C, Perondi D, Godinho M, Diel J, Machado L Molecules. 2022; 27(21).
PMID: 36364342 PMC: 9658530. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217515.
From grass to battery anode: agricultural biomass hemp-derived carbon for lithium storage.
Um J, Ahn C, Kim J, Jeong M, Sung Y, Cho Y RSC Adv. 2022; 8(56):32231-32240.
PMID: 35547481 PMC: 9086231. DOI: 10.1039/c8ra06958a.
Li L, Sun F, Gao J, Wang L, Pi X, Zhao G RSC Adv. 2022; 8(26):14488-14499.
PMID: 35540785 PMC: 9079918. DOI: 10.1039/c8ra02127a.