» Articles » PMID: 14985565

Role of Lopinavir/ritonavir in the Treatment of SARS: Initial Virological and Clinical Findings

Overview
Journal Thorax
Date 2004 Feb 27
PMID 14985565
Citations 848
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The clinical response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin was examined after establishing the in vitro antiviral susceptibility of the SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of antiviral agents.

Methods: The in vitro susceptibility of the prototype of SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors currently licensed for clinical use was studied. Forty one patients with SARS followed for 3 weeks were treated with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin. The clinical progress and virological outcomes were monitored and compared with 111 patients treated with ribavirin only who served as historical controls.

Results: In vitro antiviral activity against SARS associated coronavirus was demonstrated for lopinavir and ribavirin at concentrations of 4 micro g/ml and 50 micro g/ml, respectively, only at 48 hours. The adverse clinical outcome (ARDS or death) was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the historical controls (2.4% v 28.8%, p<0.001) at day 21 after the onset of symptoms. The adverse outcome remained significantly lower in the treatment group than in the controls-both those diagnosed early (p<0.001) and those diagnosed later in the course of the epidemic (p = 0.002)-but there was no significant difference in adverse outcome rates between the two time periods (p = 0.548). No time related difference in outcome was observed in the control groups. A reduction in steroid usage and nosocomial infections was seen in patients initially treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, and these patients had a decreasing viral load and rising peripheral lymphocyte count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, hepatitis B carrier status, and lack of treatment with this antiviral combination were independent predictors of an adverse outcome. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was associated with a better outcome even when adjusted for baseline lactate dehydrogenase level.

Conclusions: The apparent favourable clinical response with lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin supports further randomised placebo controlled trials in patients with SARS.

Citing Articles

Potential Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Agents: A Key Arsenal Against Newly Emerging and Reemerging Respiratory RNA Viruses.

Luong Q, Hoang P, Ho P, Ayun R, Lee T, Lee S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003946 PMC: 11855616. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041481.


Comparative efficacy of repurposed drugs lopinavir-ritonavir and darunavir-ritonavir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: insights from a tertiary centre cohort.

Paroczai D, Bikov A, Blidaru A, Bobu E, Lascu A, Mot C Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025; 14:1496176.

PMID: 39885967 PMC: 11779713. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1496176.


COVID-19 Pandemic and Cardiovascular Disease.

Rali A, Sauer A US Cardiol. 2024; 14:e01.

PMID: 39720444 PMC: 11664787. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2020.14.


Navigating the COVID-19 Therapeutic Landscape: Unveiling Novel Perspectives on FDA-Approved Medications, Vaccination Targets, and Emerging Novel Strategies.

Barghash R, Gemmati D, Awad A, Elbakry M, Tisato V, Awad K Molecules. 2024; 29(23.

PMID: 39683724 PMC: 11643501. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29235564.


Identification of CRTH2 as a New PPARγ-Target Gene in T Cells Suggested CRTH2 Dependent Conversion of T2 Cells as Therapeutic Concept in COVID-19 Infection.

Becker A, Rohrich K, Leske A, Heinicke U, Knape T, Kannt A Immunotargets Ther. 2024; 13:595-616.

PMID: 39507298 PMC: 11539866. DOI: 10.2147/ITT.S463601.


References
1.
Hurst M, Faulds D . Lopinavir. Drugs. 2001; 60(6):1371-9; discussion 1380-1. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200060060-00009. View

2.
Bernard G, Artigas A, Brigham K, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L . The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 149(3 Pt 1):818-24. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706. View

3.
Falsey A, Walsh E . Novel coronavirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003; 361(9366):1312-3. PMC: 7124358. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13084-X. View

4.
Peiris J, Lai S, Poon L, Guan Y, Yam L, Lim W . Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003; 361(9366):1319-25. PMC: 7112372. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13077-2. View

5.
So L, Lau A, Yam L, Cheung T, Poon E, Yung R . Development of a standard treatment protocol for severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003; 361(9369):1615-7. PMC: 7112408. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13265-5. View