» Articles » PMID: 14963600

[Evidence Based Clinical Practice. Part 1--well Structured Clinical Questions]

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2004 Feb 14
PMID 14963600
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinical decisions in daily practice, to resolve patient's problem, are usually based at the conscious use of the available information, through explicit determined rules. Evidence based clinical practice recognize the explicit and tacit knowledge, understanding that it is impossible all the aspects of professional competence become explicit. The doubt becomes part of the decision process, identifying initially the unconscious component involved and after the explicit knowledge used. When we make a structured clinical question with a possible answer, it is necessary to remember that the doubt can be related to basics and of definition aspects of the disease or related to the patient's manager, like diagnose, treatment and prognosis. Along our medical life, both types of question are present, with proportional change as the experience increase along the clinical practice. The process to find an appropriate answer to the doubt, came out at patient's care, depends on how the parts of this process will be structured. The recommended form is known by PICO abbreviation, that means: P: patient or population, I: intervention or indicator, C: comparison or control and O: outcome, or the answer expected found at the scientific information bases. This is the first basic need to a successful search, and the second need is to find the key words that better describe each of the four components of the questions. Without this caution, the search at compute databases results in absence of information or in a lot of information that it is not related to our interest.

Citing Articles

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuropsychiatric and sleep disorders, and quality of life in individuals with neurodegenerative and demyelinating diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

de Oliveira M, de Castro A, Miri A, Lima C, Truax B, Probst V BMC Neurol. 2023; 23(1):150.

PMID: 37046209 PMC: 10091330. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03176-9.


Prognostic factors for ESD of early gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

De Marco M, Tustumi F, Brunaldi V, Resende R, Matsubayashi C, Baba E Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8(9):E1144-E1155.

PMID: 32904802 PMC: 7458740. DOI: 10.1055/a-1201-3089.


The FIFA 11+ injury prevention program for soccer players: a systematic review.

Sadigursky D, Braid J, De Lira D, Machado B, Carneiro R, Colavolpe P BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2017; 9:18.

PMID: 29209504 PMC: 5704377. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-017-0083-z.


Guidelines on Beta-thalassemia major - regular blood transfusion therapy: Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular: project guidelines: Associação Médica Brasileira - 2016.

Langhi Jr D, Ubiali E, Marques Jr J, Verissimo M, Loggetto S, Silvinato A Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2016; 38(4):341-345.

PMID: 27863763 PMC: 5119672. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.09.003.


Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages.

Porzsolt F, Rocha N, Toledo-Arruda A, Thomaz T, Moraes C, Bessa-Guerra T Pragmat Obs Res. 2016; 6:47-54.

PMID: 27774032 PMC: 5045025. DOI: 10.2147/POR.S89946.