» Articles » PMID: 1495404

The Effect of Foregrounding on Readers' Use of Predictive Inferences

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 1992 Jul 1
PMID 1495404
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This research extends previous attempts to determine whether subjects make predictive inferences during comprehension. For example, when subjects read a passage about someone falling out of a 14th-story window, do they infer that the person is dead? Previous research in which lexical decision, word naming, and recognition tasks have been used for detecting predictive inferences has had mixed results. In experiment 1, a word-stem completion task was used to test for predictive inferences. The word stems were formed from target inferences that followed either priming or control passages. The data revealed that predictive inferences are generated only about concepts that are foregrounded in the passages. In Experiments 2 and 3, lexical decision and naming were used to test for predictive inferences. The lexical decision data replicated the word-stem completion data. A control experiment ruled out a simple context-checking explanation for the lexical decision results. The naming data indicated that this tasks was not sensitive to elaborative inference generation. The results show that readers make predictive inferences, but do so selectively.

Citing Articles

Non-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and theory of mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach.

Hauptman M, Blank I, Fedorenko E Cortex. 2023; 162:96-114.

PMID: 37023480 PMC: 10210011. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.013.


Attentional Competition and Semantic Integration in Low- and High-Span Readers.

Guan C, Fraundorf S, Gao M, Zhang C, MacWhinney B Front Psychol. 2022; 13:871094.

PMID: 35668981 PMC: 9165598. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871094.


Character movement and the representation of space during narrative comprehension.

Rapp D, Klug J, Taylor H Mem Cognit. 2007; 34(6):1206-20.

PMID: 17225503 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193266.


Strategic influence on the time course of predictive inferences in reading.

Calvo M, Castillo M, Schmalhofer F Mem Cognit. 2006; 34(1):68-77.

PMID: 16686107 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193387.


Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension.

Beeman M, Bowden E, Gernsbacher M Brain Lang. 2000; 71(2):310-36.

PMID: 10716864 PMC: 4364278. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2268.


References
1.
Lucas M, Tanenhaus M, Carlson G . Levels of representation in the interpretation of anaphoric reference and instrument inference. Mem Cognit. 1990; 18(6):611-31. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197104. View

2.
McKoon G, Ratcliff R . Inferences about predictable events. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986; 12(1):82-91. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.1.82. View

3.
Neely J, Keefe D, Ross K . Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(6):1003-19. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1003. View

4.
Duffy S . Role of expectations in sentence integration. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986; 12(2):208-19. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.12.2.208. View

5.
McKoon G, Ratcliff R . Semantic associations and elaborative inference. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(2):326-38. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.326. View