» Articles » PMID: 1493395

Excision Biopsy of Malignant Melanoma by General Practitioners in South East Scotland 1982-91

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1992 Dec 12
PMID 1493395
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the management of patients who had a malignant melanoma excised initially by general practitioners in south east Scotland over the past 10 years and to assess the impact of the April 1990 contract on this.

Design: A retrospective case-control study.

Setting: South east Scotland.

Subjects: All patients in south east Scotland who had malignant melanomas excised by general practitioners in 1982-91.

Outcome Measures: Demographic details of patients; Breslow thickness, clearance of excision.

Results: 42 patients had malignant melanomas excised by general practitioners in 1982-91: 15 in 1982-9 and 27 in 1990-1. These patients were significantly younger than those who had their tumours excised initially in hospital. Although the longest diameter of melanomas excised by general practitioners was significantly less than of those excised in hospital, the Breslow thicknesses were similar. Completeness of initial excision was doubtful or incomplete in nine (23%) general practitioner excisions compared with 4% of hospital excisions, but the time interval between excision biopsy and wide excision was similar. Pathology requests accompanying excision biopsies mentioned melanoma as a possible diagnosis in 15% (6/40) of general practitioner cases compared with 79% of hospital cases. Thirty nine general practitioners responded to a questionnaire and only 12 had considered melanoma in the differential diagnosis.

Conclusions: General practitioners need to think more often of malignant melanoma when they excise pigmented lesions and when they consider this tumour a possibility should perform an excision biopsy with a lateral clearance of at least 2 mm.

Citing Articles

Incomplete Excisions of Melanocytic Lesions: Rates and Risk Factors.

Berglund S, Johansson Backman E, Baldawi Z, Horn L, Arbin Borsiin R, Marjanovic M Acta Derm Venereol. 2021; 101(3):adv00421.

PMID: 33723615 PMC: 9366675. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3784.


Melanoma in primary care. The role of the general practitioner.

Buckley D, McMonagle C Ir J Med Sci. 2013; 183(3):363-8.

PMID: 24091614 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-013-1021-z.


Mortality and morbidity after initial diagnostic excision biopsy of cutaneous melanoma in primary versus secondary care.

Murchie P, Raja E, Lee A, Campbell N Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(613):e563-72.

PMID: 23972197 PMC: 3722833. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670697.


Primary excision of cutaneous melanoma: does the location of excision matter.

Murchie P, Sinclair E, Lee A Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(583):131-4.

PMID: 21276340 PMC: 3026152. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X556272.


To excise or not to excise? Should GPs remove possible melanomas?.

Purdy S, de Berker D Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(583):87-8.

PMID: 21276332 PMC: 3026145. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X556164.


References
1.
Bagley F, Cady B, Lee A, LEGG M . Changes in clinical presentation and management of malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1981; 47(9):2126-34. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810501)47:9<2126::aid-cncr2820470904>3.0.co;2-c. View

2.
Anibarro B, Caballero T, Garcia-Ara C, Diaz-Pena J, Ojeda J . Asthma with sulfite intolerance in children: a blocking study with cyanocobalamin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992; 90(1):103-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(06)80016-3. View

3.
Shrank A . General practitioners and minor surgery. Br J Dermatol. 1991; 125(6):599-600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb14804.x. View

4.
Nichol G, Nix A, Chung K, Barnes P . Characterisation of bronchoconstrictor responses to sodium metabisulphite aerosol in atopic subjects with and without asthma. Thorax. 1989; 44(12):1009-14. PMC: 1020876. DOI: 10.1136/thx.44.12.1009. View

5.
Lederman J, Sober A . Does biopsy type influence survival in clinical stage I cutaneous melanoma?. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985; 13(6):983-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70249-6. View