» Articles » PMID: 1486890

A Simple Medium for the Primary Isolation of Haemophilus Ducreyi

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 1992 Oct 1
PMID 1486890
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two simple, inexpensive media containing gonococcal agar-base, supplemented with 5% Fildes' extract and either chocolated or unchocolated horse blood (GC-FHBC or GC-FHB) were compared with the standard gonococcal agar-based (GC-HgS) and Mueller-Hinton agar-based media (MH-HB) normally used for primary isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi from presumptive chancroid lesions. Overall, Haemophilus ducreyi was recovered from 162 of 178 (91%) samples from primary chancroid lesions. As a single isolation medium GC-HgS proved the most sensitive with an isolation rate of 80% followed by GC-FHB (75%), MH-HB and GC-FHC (both 71%). Use of a combination of GC-HgS and MH-HB resulted in isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi in 160 of 178 cases (90%). Since GC-FHB is approximately one-quarter the cost of the combination and half the cost of GC-HgS or MH-HB alone, this medium could prove suitable for diagnostic purposes in developing countries where chancroid is endemic.

Citing Articles

Diagnosis and Management of Chancroid in Nigeria.

Mbata T, Onile B, Agbonlahor D, Odugbemi T, Anukam K, Onyedum U Malawi Med J. 2016; 16(1):19-21.

PMID: 27528984 PMC: 3345501.


Regulation of expression of the Haemophilus ducreyi LspB and LspA2 proteins by CpxR.

Labandeira-Rey M, Mock J, Hansen E Infect Immun. 2009; 77(8):3402-11.

PMID: 19451237 PMC: 2715676. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00292-09.


The laboratory diagnosis of Haemophilus ducreyi.

Alfa M Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2007; 16(1):31-4.

PMID: 18159525 PMC: 2095004. DOI: 10.1155/2005/851610.


Chancroid.

Lewis D, Ison C Sex Transm Infect. 2006; 82 Suppl 4:iv19-20.

PMID: 17151046 PMC: 2563904. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2006.023127.


Diagnostic tests for chancroid.

Lewis D Sex Transm Infect. 2000; 76(2):137-41.

PMID: 10858718 PMC: 1758295. DOI: 10.1136/sti.76.2.137.


References
1.
Hammond G, Lian C, Wilt J, Ronald A . Comparison of specimen collection and laboratory techniques for isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. J Clin Microbiol. 1978; 7(1):39-43. PMC: 274853. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.7.1.39-43.1978. View

2.
Bilgeri Y, Ballard R, Duncan M, Mauff A, Koornhof H . Antimicrobial susceptibility of 103 strains of Haemophilus ducreyi isolated in Johannesburg. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982; 22(4):686-8. PMC: 183814. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.22.4.686. View

3.
Kunimoto D, Slaney L, Koss J, DCosta L, Plummer F, Ronald A . Field testing of modified Bieling media for the isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi in Kenya. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 5(6):673-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02013300. View

4.
Kilian M . A taxonomic study of the genus Haemophilus, with the proposal of a new species. J Gen Microbiol. 1976; 93(1):9-62. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-93-1-9. View

5.
Nsanze H, Plummer F, Maggwa A, Maitha G, Dylewski J, Piot P . Comparison of media for the primary isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Sex Transm Dis. 1984; 11(1):6-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-198401000-00002. View