18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Staging and Restaging in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To assess the information supplied by FDG-PET in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer both in the initial staging and in the evaluation of tumor changes induced by preoperative chemoradiation (restaging).
Methods And Materials: Twenty-five consecutive patients with rectal cancer were included, with tumor stages (c)T(2-4)N(x)M(0), during the period 1997-1999. We prospectively performed two FDG-PET scans in all patients to assess disease stage (1) at initial diagnosis and (2) presurgically, 4 to 5 weeks after protracted chemoradiation. Protracted chemoradiation was carried out during 5-6 weeks with 45-50 Gy, plus concurrent oral tegafur 1200 mg/day or 5-fluorouracil 500-1000 mg/m(2) administered as a 24-h continuous i.v. infusion on Days 1-4 and 21-25 of the radiotherapy treatment. Tumors were staged with CT in 95% of patients, whereas endorectal ultrasound was used in 90% of patients. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was used as the quantitative parameter to estimate the tumor:tissue metabolic ratio.
Results: Preoperative chemoradiation significantly decreased the SUVMAX: 5.9 (mean SUVmax at initial staging) vs. 2.4 (mean SUVmax after chemoradiation) with p < 0.001. Unknown liver metastases were detected by FDG-PET in 2 patients, in 1 of them with the initial staging FDG-PET scan, and with the restaging FDG-PET scan in the other. After an average follow-up of 39 months, the value of SUVmax > or =6 allowed us to discriminate for survival at 3 years: 92% vs. 60% (p = 0.04). T downstaging (total 62%) was significantly correlated with SUVmax changes: 1.9 vs. 3.3 (p = 0.03). The degree of rectal cancer response to chemoradiation, established as mic vs. mac categories, was not associated with SUVmax differences (mean values of 2.0 vs. 2.7).
Conclusion: Preliminary results observed suggest the potential utility of FDG-PET as a complementary diagnostic procedure in the initial clinical evaluation (8% of unsuspected liver metastases) as well as in the assessment of chemoradiation response (any T downstaged event) of locally advanced rectal cancer. Initial SUVmax might be of prognostic value related to long-term patient outcome.
Rosa C, Gasparini L, Di Guglielmo F, Caravatta L, DI Tommaso M, Delli Pizzi A In Vivo. 2023; 37(1):424-432.
PMID: 36593016 PMC: 9843791. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13095.
Alexandrescu S, Dumitru A, Babiuc R, Costea R Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2022; 62(2):411-425.
PMID: 35024729 PMC: 8848272. DOI: 10.47162/RJME.62.2.07.
Wu K, Chen S, Hsieh T, Yen K, Law K, Kuo Y Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(24).
PMID: 34944970 PMC: 8699508. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246350.
Martin-Gonzalez P, de Mariscal E, Martino M, Gordaliza P, Peligros I, Carreras J PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0242597.
PMID: 33253194 PMC: 7704000. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242597.
Shen W, Chen S, Wu K, Lee P, Feng C, Hsieh T Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(5):207.
PMID: 32309354 PMC: 7154452. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.107.