Updating Situation Models
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The authors examined how situation models are updated during text comprehension. If comprehenders keep track of the evolving situation, they should update their models such that the most current information, the here and now, is more available than outdated information. Contrary to this updating hypothesis, E. J. O'Brien, M. L. Rizzella, J. E. Albrecht, and J. G. Halleran (1998) obtained results suggesting that outdated or incorrect information may still influence the comprehension process. The authors of the current study demonstrate that the nature of E. J. O'Brien et al.'s materials were the likely cause of this pattern of results. Hence, the current authors constructed materials that circumvent identified confounds and in a reading-time experiment obtained evidence supporting the here-and-now hypothesis.
Learning to Use Narrative Function Words for the Organization and Communication of Experience.
Pointeau G, Mirliaz S, Mealier A, Dominey P Front Psychol. 2021; 12:591703.
PMID: 33762991 PMC: 7982915. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.591703.
Listener's personality traits predict changes in pupil size during auditory language comprehension.
Hubert Lyall I, Jarvikivi J Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5443.
PMID: 33686122 PMC: 7940482. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84886-3.
Neural Correlates of Modal Displacement and Discourse-Updating under (Un)Certainty.
Tulling M, Law R, Cournane A, Pylkkanen L eNeuro. 2020; 8(1).
PMID: 33288644 PMC: 7810261. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0290-20.2020.
How are mental simulations updated across sentences?.
Hoeben Mannaert L, Dijkstra K, Zwaan R Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(6):1201-1214.
PMID: 30963424 PMC: 6677877. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00928-2.
Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach.
Kendeou P, Butterfuss R, Kim J, Van Boekel M Mem Cognit. 2018; 47(1):33-46.
PMID: 30117115 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y.