» Articles » PMID: 14727803

Tackling Health Inequalities in the United Kingdom: the Progress and Pitfalls of Policy

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 2004 Jan 20
PMID 14727803
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Goal: Assess the progress and pitfalls of current United Kingdom (U.K.) policies to reduce health inequalities.

Objectives: (1) Describe the context enabling health inequalities to get onto the policy agenda in the United Kingdom. (2) Categorize and assess selected current U.K. policies that may affect health inequalities. (3) Apply the "policy windows" model to understand the issues faced in formulating and implementing such policies. (4) Examine the emerging policy challenges in the U.K. and elsewhere.

Data Sources: Official documents, secondary analyses, and interviews with policymakers.

Study Design: Qualitative, policy analysis.

Data Collection: 2001-2002. The methods were divided into two stages. The first identified policies which were connected with individual inquiry recommendations. The second involved case-studies of three policies areas which were thought to be crucial in tackling health inequalities. Both stages involved interviews with policymakers and documentary analysis.

Principal Findings: (1) The current U.K. government stated a commitment to reducing health inequalities. (2) The government has begun to implement policies that address the wider determinants. (3) Some progress is evident but many indicators remain stubborn. (4) Difficulties remain in terms of coordinating policies across government and measuring progress. (5) The "policy windows" model explains the limited extent of progress and highlights current and possible future pitfalls. (6) The U.K.'s experience has lessons for other governments involved in tackling health inequalities.

Conclusions: Health inequalities are on the agenda of U.K. government policy and steps have been made to address them. There are some signs of progress but much remains to be done including overcoming some of the perverse incentives at the national level, improving joint working, ensuring appropriate measures of performance/progress, and improving monitoring arrangements. A conceptual policy model aids understanding and points to ways of sustaining and extending the recent progress and overcoming pitfalls.

Citing Articles

Cross-sector collaboration to reduce health inequalities: a qualitative study of local collaboration between health care, social services, and other sectors under health system reforms in England.

Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Mays N BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2613.

PMID: 39334058 PMC: 11438096. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20089-5.


Solving poverty or tackling healthcare inequalities? Qualitative study exploring local interpretations of national policy on health inequalities under new NHS reforms in England.

Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Mays N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e081954.

PMID: 38589267 PMC: 11015303. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081954.


A review of the current policies and guidance regarding Apgar scoring and the detection of jaundice and cyanosis concerning Black, Asian and ethnic minority neonates.

Furness A, Fair F, Higginbottom G, Oddie S, Soltani H BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):198.

PMID: 38515076 PMC: 10956215. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04692-4.


Extending Kingdon's Multiple Streams Policy Framework Through an Analysis of How Community Health Workers in India Are Driving Policy Changes.

Santosh S, Kane S Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2023; 45(3):245-260.

PMID: 38105229 PMC: 11863506. DOI: 10.1177/2752535X231222654.


Eliciting public values on health inequalities: missing evidence for ?.

McHugh N Evid Policy. 2023; 18(4):733-745.

PMID: 36865399 PMC: 7614257. DOI: 10.1332/174426421X16286783870175.


References
1.
Mackenbach J, Stronks K, Kunst A . The contribution of medical care to inequalities in health: differences between socio-economic groups in decline of mortality from conditions amenable to medical intervention. Soc Sci Med. 1989; 29(3):369-76. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90285-2. View

2.
Klein R . From evidence-based medicine to evidence-based policy?. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000; 5(2):65-6. DOI: 10.1177/135581960000500201. View

3.
Smith G, Morris J, Shaw M . The independent inquiry into inequalities in health is welcome, but its recommendations are too cautious and vague. BMJ. 1998; 317(7171):1465-6. PMC: 1114331. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7171.1465. View

4.
ILLSLEY R . Reducing health inequalities: Britain's latest attempt. Health Aff (Millwood). 1999; 18(3):45-6. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.45. View

5.
Birch S . The 39 steps: the mystery of health inequalities in the UK. Health Econ. 1999; 8(4):301-8. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199906)8:4<301::aid-hec446>3.0.co;2-t. View