» Articles » PMID: 14727100

Association of Clinical Characteristics of Unexplained Syncope with the Outcome of Head-up Tilt Tests in Children

Overview
Journal Pediatr Cardiol
Date 2004 Jan 17
PMID 14727100
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify the association of clinical characteristics of unexplained syncope with the outcome of the head-up tilt test (HUT) in children. A total of 47 patients with unexplained syncope were classified into two groups according to their outcomes of HUT: the positive response group and the negative response group. We reviewed their clinical data as well as the results of HUT and analyzed them with logistic regression method. The results showed that the incidence of positive responses to HUT was higher in girls than in boys (8/22 vs 10/7, p < 0.05). Compared with fainted children younger than 12 years of age, 12- to 16-year-old adolescents with unexplained syncope had a high positive outcome of HUT (30 vs 72.9%, p < 0.05). Compared with fainted children with negative response of HUT, children with positive response to HUT often had syncope in special circumstances (e.g., prolonged standing, anxiety and fright, and morning exercise), and they often had prodrome, such as pallor, lightheadedness, and nausea (28/30 vs 8/17, p < 0.05). However, the number and duration of syncopal spells did not relate to the positive responses to HUT. The logistic regression analysis showed that three factors significantly influenced the outcome of HUT: predisposing factors of syncope, prodrome of syncope, and age (p < 0.05; OR = 32.9434, 17.7281, and 2.7842, respectively). Hence, if pubertal girls with unexplained syncope had clear predisposing factors and prodromes, they were likely to have positive responses to HUT, and they were likely to be clinically considered as having vasovagal syncope.

Citing Articles

Psychopathological Correlates and Psychosocial Functioning in Children and Adolescents with Syncope: A Systematic Review.

Cuzzocrea G, Fontana A, Mascanzoni M, Manca F, Pecora R, Trani L Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024; 21(5):358-375.

PMID: 39540075 PMC: 11555659. DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240502.


Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope in children and adolescents (revised 2024).

Wang C, Liao Y, Wang S, Tian H, Huang M, Dong X World J Pediatr. 2024; 20(10):983-1002.

PMID: 39110332 PMC: 11502568. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-024-00819-w.


Spectrum of underlying diseases in syncope and treatment of neurally-mediated syncope in children and adolescents over the past 30 years: A single center study.

Cui Y, Liao Y, Zhang Q, Yan H, Liu P, Wang Y Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:1017505.

PMID: 36518687 PMC: 9742595. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017505.


Twenty-four-hour urine NE level as a predictor of the therapeutic response to metoprolol in children with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

Kong Q, Yang X, Cai Z, Pan Y, Wang M, Liu M Ir J Med Sci. 2019; 188(4):1279-1287.

PMID: 30761458 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-01979-9.


[Syncope in children and adolescents].

Muller M, Paul T Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2018; 29(2):204-207.

PMID: 29761336 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-018-0562-2.


References
1.
Grubb B . Pathophysiology and differential diagnosis of neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84(8A):3Q-9Q. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00691-8. View

2.
Sutton R, Bloomfield D . Indications, methodology, and classification of results of tilt-table testing. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84(8A):10Q-19Q. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00692-x. View

3.
Levine M . Neurally mediated syncope in children: results of tilt testing, treatment, and long-term follow-up. Pediatr Cardiol. 1999; 20(5):331-5. DOI: 10.1007/s002469900479. View

4.
Lipsitz L, Mietus J, Moody G, Goldberger A . Spectral characteristics of heart rate variability before and during postural tilt. Relations to aging and risk of syncope. Circulation. 1990; 81(6):1803-10. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.81.6.1803. View

5.
Sheldon R, Killam S . Methodology of isoproterenol-tilt table testing in patients with syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19(4):773-9. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90517-q. View