» Articles » PMID: 14724166

Accuracy of Reporting of Family History of Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2004 Jan 16
PMID 14724166
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Family history is used extensively to estimate the risk of colorectal cancer but there is considerable potential for recall bias and inaccuracy. Hence we systematically assessed the accuracy of family history reported at interview compared with actual cancer experience in relatives.

Methods: Using face to face interviews, we recorded family history from 199 colorectal cancer cases and 133 community controls, totalling 5637 first and second degree relatives (FDRs/SDRs). We linked computerised cancer registry data to interview information to determine the accuracy of family history reporting.

Results: Cases substantially underreported colorectal cancer arising both in FDRs (sensitivity 0.566 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.433, 0.690); specificity 0.990 (95% CI 0.983, 0.994)) and SDRs (sensitivity 0.271 (95% CI 0.166, 0.410); specificity 0.996 (95% CI 0.992, 0.998)). There was no observable difference in accuracy of reporting family history between case and control interviewees. Control subjects similarly underreported colorectal cancer in FDRs (sensitivity 0.529 (95% CI 0.310, 0.738); specificity 0.995 (95% CI 0.989, 0.998)) and SDRs (sensitivity 0.333 (95% CI 0.192, 0.512); specificity 0.995 (95% CI 0.991, 0.995)). To determine practical implications of inaccurate family history, we applied family history criteria before and after record linkage. Only two of five families reported at interview to meet surveillance criteria did so after validation, whereas only two of six families that actually merited surveillance were identified by interview.

Conclusions: This study has quantified the inaccuracy of interview in identifying people at risk of colorectal cancer due to a family history. Colorectal cancer was substantially underreported and so family history information should be interpreted with caution. These findings have considerable relevance to identifying patients who merit surveillance colonoscopy and to epidemiological studies.

Citing Articles

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.

Issaka R, Chan A, Gupta S Gastroenterology. 2023; 165(5):1280-1291.

PMID: 37737817 PMC: 10591903. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.033.


Effects of Fecal Occult Blood Immunoassay Screening for Colorectal Cancer-Experience from a Hospital in Central Taiwan.

Yang P, Yang I, Chiang T, Tsai C, Yang Y, Lin I Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(4).

PMID: 37109638 PMC: 10146924. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59040680.


Expanding Family Health History to Include Family Medication History.

Haga S, Orlando L J Pers Med. 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36983592 PMC: 10053261. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13030410.


Nurse's Roles in Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Narrative Review.

Hashemi N, Bahrami M, Tabesh E, Arbon P J Prev (2022). 2022; 43(6):759-782.

PMID: 36001253 DOI: 10.1007/s10935-022-00694-z.


Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults.

Dharwadkar P, Zaki T, Murphy C Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022; 36(3):449-470.

PMID: 35577711 PMC: 9177054. DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.005.


References
1.
Dunlop M . Guidance on gastrointestinal surveillance for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polypolis, juvenile polyposis, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Gut. 2002; 51 Suppl 5:V21-7. PMC: 1867741. DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_5.v21. View

2.
Dunlop M . Guidance on large bowel surveillance for people with two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer or one first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under 45 years. Gut. 2002; 51 Suppl 5:V17-20. PMC: 1867737. DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_5.v17. View

3.
Sijmons R, Boonstra A, Reefhuis J, de Walle H, Oosterwijk J, Cornel M . Accuracy of family history of cancer: clinical genetic implications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000; 8(3):181-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200441. View

4.
Brewster D, Muir C, Crichton J . Registration of colorectal cancer in Scotland: an assessment of data accuracy based on review of medical records. Public Health. 1995; 109(4):285-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80206-1. View

5.
Aitken J, Bain C, Ward M, Siskind V, MACLENNAN R . How accurate is self-reported family history of colorectal cancer?. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 141(9):863-71. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117522. View