» Articles » PMID: 14704201

Theoretical Basis of the Beavis Effect

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2004 Jan 6
PMID 14704201
Citations 188
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The core of statistical inference is based on both hypothesis testing and estimation. The use of inferential statistics for QTL identification thus includes estimation of genetic effects and statistical tests. Typically, QTL are reported only when the test statistics reach a predetermined critical value. Therefore, the estimated effects of detected QTL are actually sampled from a truncated distribution. As a result, the expectations of detected QTL effects are biased upward. In a simulation study, William D. Beavis showed that the average estimates of phenotypic variances associated with correctly identified QTL were greatly overestimated if only 100 progeny were evaluated, slightly overestimated if 500 progeny were evaluated, and fairly close to the actual magnitude when 1000 progeny were evaluated. This phenomenon has subsequently been called the Beavis effect. Understanding the theoretical basis of the Beavis effect will help interpret QTL mapping results and improve success of marker-assisted selection. This study provides a statistical explanation for the Beavis effect. The theoretical prediction agrees well with the observations reported in Beavis's original simulation study. Application of the theory to meta-analysis of QTL mapping is discussed.

Citing Articles

Mapping genes for human face shape: Exploration of univariate phenotyping strategies.

Yuan M, Goovaerts S, Vanneste M, Matthews H, Hoskens H, Richmond S PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(12):e1012617.

PMID: 39621772 PMC: 11661606. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012617.


Mapping rust resistance in European winter wheat: many QTLs for yellow rust resistance, but only a few well characterized genes for stem rust resistance.

Miedaner T, Eckhoff W, Flath K, Schmitt A, Schulz P, Schacht J Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(9):215.

PMID: 39235622 PMC: 11377555. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04731-9.


Loci associated with cave-derived traits concentrate in specific regions of the Mexican cavefish genome.

Wiese J, Richards E, Kowalko J, McGaugh S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38585759 PMC: 10996652. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.29.587360.


Enhancing grapevine breeding efficiency through genomic prediction and selection index.

Brault C, Segura V, Roques M, Lamblin P, Bouckenooghe V, Pouzalgues N G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38401528 PMC: 10989862. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae038.


Unravelling novel and pleiotropic genes for cannon bone circumference and bone mineral density in Yorkshire pigs.

Qiu Z, Cai W, Liu Q, Liu K, Liu C, Yang H J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 38330300 PMC: 10914368. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae036.


References
1.
Haley C, Knott S . A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb). 1992; 69(4):315-24. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. View

2.
Otto S, Jones C . Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics. 2000; 156(4):2093-107. PMC: 1461347. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.2093. View

3.
Hayes B, Goddard M . The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet Sel Evol. 2001; 33(3):209-29. PMC: 2705405. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209. View

4.
Xu S . Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics. 2003; 163(2):789-801. PMC: 1462468. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/163.2.789. View

5.
Luo L, Mao Y, Xu S . Correcting the bias in estimation of genetic variances contributed by individual QTL. Genetica. 2003; 119(2):107-13. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026028928003. View