» Articles » PMID: 14694505

Effect of Load During Electrical Stimulation Training in Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Journal Muscle Nerve
Date 2003 Dec 25
PMID 14694505
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrical stimulation training is known to alter skeletal muscle characteristics after a spinal cord injury, but the effect of load on optimizing the training protocol has not been fully investigated. This study investigated two electrical-stimulation training regimes with different loads on intramuscular parameters of the paralyzed lower limbs. Six paraplegic individuals with a spinal cord injury underwent electrical stimulation training (45 min daily for 3 days per week for 10 weeks). One leg was trained statically with load, and the contralateral leg was trained dynamically with minimal load. Isometric force assessed with 35-HZ stimuli increased significantly in both legs from baseline, with the static-trained leg also being significantly higher than the dynamic-trained leg. The vastus lateralis muscle of the statically trained leg showed a significant increase in type I fibers, fiber cross-sectional area, capillary-to-fiber ratio, and citrate synthase activity when compared to both baseline and the dynamically trained leg. Relative oxygenation of the vastus lateralis muscle as determined by near infrared spectroscopy was also significantly greater after static training. This study indicates that the load that is applied to paralyzed muscle during an electrical stimulation training program is an important factor in determining the amount of muscle adaptation that can be achieved.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Lower Limb Combined Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Skeletal Muscle Cross-Sectional Area and Inflammatory Signaling.

Alharbi A, Li J, Womack E, Farrow M, Yarar-Fisher C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456876 PMC: 11507577. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011095.


Functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of health and fitness-related outcomes.

VAN DER Scheer J, Goosey-Tolfrey V, Valentino S, Davis G, Ho C J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021; 18(1):99.

PMID: 34118958 PMC: 8196442. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00882-8.


Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury: aetiology, effects and therapeutic approaches.

Abdelrahman S, Ireland A, Winter E, Purcell M, Coupaud S J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2021; 21(1):26-50.

PMID: 33657753 PMC: 8020025.


Rehabilitation interventions to modify endocrine-metabolic disease risk in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury living in the community (RIISC): A systematic search and review of prospective cohort and case-control studies.

Gibbs J, Patsakos E, Maltais D, Wolfe D, Gagnon D, Craven B J Spinal Cord Med. 2021; 46(1):6-25.

PMID: 33596167 PMC: 9897753. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1863898.


Factors influencing thigh muscle volume change with cycling exercises in acute spinal cord injury - a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Panisset M, El-Ansary D, Dunlop S, Marshall R, Clark J, Churilov L J Spinal Cord Med. 2020; 45(4):510-521.

PMID: 32970970 PMC: 9246176. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1815480.