» Articles » PMID: 14673403

Biomechanical Measure Validation for Spinal Manipulation in Clinical Settings

Overview
Date 2003 Dec 16
PMID 14673403
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity and fidelity of the Leander 900 Z Series treatment table (Leader Health Technologies Corporation, Port Orchard, Wash) with an imbedded AMTI force plate (Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc, Watertown, Mass) as a sensing system and to test its ability to quantify small, statistically significant changes in biomechanical parameters of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).

Setting: Technology bench testing and Chiropractic College.

Methods: Complex forces and moments were applied to the modified treatment table, including standardized static and dynamic loads and those exerted by chiropractic students when delivering spinal manipulative therapy. Manipulation data was postprocessed by a second-order Butterworth filter with a 5-Hz cutoff frequency. Changes in lumbar spinal manipulative therapy procedures performed by chiropractic students were digitally recorded using the sensing system at approximately 1-month intervals throughout the course of a trimester of training.

Results: The system frequency response remains relatively consistent over the interval of test loads from 89 N to 222 N and from 53 nm to 133 nm with fundamental frequencies 5.9 Hz and higher. Changes in biomechanical parameters, including peak amplitude, slope, and duration over time and training, were observed in student chiropractic manipulations. Results show a minimum of 18% (P =.0723) increase during interval 1 in mean peak amplitude and slope parameters. Only a slight (3%) mean reduction of the procedure duration was seen.

Conclusions: The results support the fidelity of the sensing system and its ability to quantify small, statistically significant changes in biomechanical parameters. With this type of instrumentation, it is feasible to assess the skill of chiropractic physicians performing spinal manipulative therapy.

Citing Articles

Comparison of force-time characteristics of prone cervicothoracic spinal manipulative therapy between chiropractic interns and chiropractors: A cross-sectional study.

Perron F, Funabashi M, Gauthier J, Page I J Chiropr Educ. 2025; 39.

PMID: 39998915 PMC: 11866453. DOI: 10.7899/JCE-24-10.


The association between students' confidence and ability to modulate spinal manipulation force-time characteristics of specific target forces: a cross-sectional study.

Nim C, Smith N, Starmer D, Wang S, Choi G, Alayed A Chiropr Man Therap. 2024; 32(1):34.

PMID: 39529163 PMC: 11552172. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00557-w.


Development of a basic evaluation model for manual therapy learning in rehabilitation students based on the Delphi method.

Ziyi W, Supo Z, Bialas M BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):964.

PMID: 39232741 PMC: 11373307. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05932-y.


Can self-assessment and augmented feedback improve performance and learning retention in manual therapy: results from an experimental study.

Pasquier M, Memari S, Lardon A, Descarreaux M Chiropr Man Therap. 2023; 31(1):35.

PMID: 37700344 PMC: 10498620. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00505-0.


Factors Associated With Clinical Responses to Spinal Manipulation in Patients With Non-specific Thoracic Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Pasquier M, Young J, Lardon A, Descarreaux M Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022; 2:742119.

PMID: 35295527 PMC: 8915706. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.742119.