» Articles » PMID: 14662811

When is Physician Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia Acceptable?

Overview
Journal J Med Ethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2003 Dec 10
PMID 14662811
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To discover what factors affect lay people's judgments of the acceptability of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia and how these factors interact.

Design: Participants rated the acceptability of either physician assisted suicide or euthanasia for 72 patient vignettes with a five factor design--that is, all combinations of patient's age (three levels); curability of illness (two levels); degree of suffering (two levels); patient's mental status (two levels), and extent of patient's requests for the procedure (three levels).

Participants: Convenience sample of 66 young adults, 62 middle aged adults, and 66 older adults living in western France.

Main Measurements: In accordance with the functional theory of cognition of N H Anderson, main effects, and interactions among patient factors and participants' characteristics were investigated by means of both graphs and ANOVA.

Results: Patient requests were the most potent determinant of acceptability. Euthanasia was generally less acceptable than physician assisted suicide, but this difference disappeared when requests were repetitive. As their own age increased, participants placed more weight on patient age as a criterion of acceptability.

Conclusions: People's judgments concur with legislation to require a repetition of patients' requests for a life ending act. Younger people, who frequently are decision makers for elderly relatives, place less emphasis on patient's age itself than do older people.

Citing Articles

Validation of the Thai translation of the attitudes toward euthanasia scale.

Trikasemmart M, Siriwechdaruk P, Hsieh P, Paradeevissut P, Wongakkarakhun N, Srisont S Heliyon. 2025; 10(22):e40271.

PMID: 39748961 PMC: 11693923. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40271.


The association between social connectedness and euthanasia and assisted suicide and related constructs: systematic review.

Corcoran E, Bird M, Batchelor R, Ahmed N, Nowland R, Pitman A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1057.

PMID: 38627694 PMC: 11020194. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18528-4.


Euthanasia in Africa: A scoping review of empirical evidence.

Amzat J, Kanmodi K, Ismail A, Egbedina E Health Sci Rep. 2023; 6(5):e1239.

PMID: 37260738 PMC: 10227490. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1239.


Canadian Undergraduates' Perspectives on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): A Quantitative Study.

Hawrelak E, Harper L, Reddon J, Powell R J Palliat Care. 2021; 37(3):352-358.

PMID: 34967239 PMC: 9344492. DOI: 10.1177/08258597211050738.


Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey.

Stolz E, Burkert N, Grossschadl F, Rasky E, Stronegger W, Freidl W PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0124320.

PMID: 25906265 PMC: 4408035. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124320.


References
1.
Braun K, Tanji V, Heck R . Support for physician-assisted suicide: exploring the impact of ethnicity and attitudes toward planning for death. Gerontologist. 2001; 41(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1093/geront/41.1.51. View

2.
Callahan D . Death and the research imperative. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(9):654-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200003023420910. View

3.
Sorum P, Munoz Sastre M, Mullet E, Gamelin A . Eliciting patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2001; 48(3):265-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00260-4. View

4.
Whitney S, BROWN Jr B, Brody H, Alcser K, Bachman J, Greely H . Views of United States physicians and members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on physician-assisted suicide. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16(5):290-6. PMC: 1495216. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.04159.x. View

5.
Sears S, Stanton A . Physician-assisted dying: review of issues and roles for health psychologists. Health Psychol. 2001; 20(4):302-10. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.20.4.302. View