» Articles » PMID: 14651432

The Doctor's Duty to the Elderly Patient in Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Drugs Aging
Specialties Geriatrics
Pharmacology
Date 2003 Dec 4
PMID 14651432
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ethical principles of beneficence (or non-maleficence), respect for persons and justice apply to both good medical practice and clinical research. Doctors have a duty to offer to their patients, of all ages, the opportunity to take part in clinical trials and to ensure that research is appropriately designed and conducted. Barriers to participation of elderly patients in clinical trials include complex protocols with onerous outcome measures, a research focus on aggressive therapies with substantial toxicity, restrictive entry criteria unnecessarily excluding concurrent conditions and medication, patients' and families' limited expectations of benefits and lack of financial, logistic and social support.Participation is encouraged when attitudes of care staff towards research are positive, altruistic motives are acknowledged, approval of family members is gained and protocols are designed for patient rather than staff convenience. Special consideration should be given to ensuring that patient consent is fully informed and freely given. Elderly patients may have more difficulty comprehending consent information and particular attention should be given to compensating for communication and sensory deficits, improving readability of information sheets and consent forms, and considering the use of innovative consent procedures. Those with cognitive impairment and the institutionalised are vulnerable to exploitation and require special consideration and management.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators to the recruitment of disabled people to clinical trials: a scoping review.

Shariq S, Cardoso Pinto A, Budhathoki S, Miller M, Cro S Trials. 2023; 24(1):171.

PMID: 36890505 PMC: 9994780. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07142-1.


Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in South Wales.

Wood F, Prout H, Bayer A, Duncan D, Nuttall J, Hood K Trials. 2013; 14:247.

PMID: 23937972 PMC: 3750808. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-247.


Vulnerability in clinical research with patients in pain: a risk analysis.

Tait R J Law Med Ethics. 2009; 37(1):59-72.

PMID: 19245603 PMC: 3148022. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00351.x.


Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa.

Moodley K, Pather M, Myer L J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(12):727-32.

PMID: 16319239 PMC: 1734072. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.009910.

References
1.
Sachs G, Stocking C, Stern R, Cox D, Hougham G, Sachs R . Ethical aspects of dementia research: informed consent and proxy consent. Clin Res. 1994; 42(3):403-12. View

2.
Sackett D . Protection for human subjects in medical research. JAMA. 2000; 283(18):2388-9; author reply 2389-90. View

3.
Marson D, Earnst K, Jamil F, Bartolucci A, Harrell L . Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(8):911-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06887.x. View

4.
Rikkert M, van den Bercken J, ten Have H, Hoefnagels W . Experienced consent in geriatrics research: a new method to optimize the capacity to consent in frail elderly subjects. J Med Ethics. 1997; 23(5):271-6. PMC: 1377364. DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.5.271. View

5.
Stanley B, GUIDO J, Stanley M, Shortell D . The elderly patient and informed consent. Empirical findings. JAMA. 1984; 252(10):1302-6. View