» Articles » PMID: 14644970

Coronary Heart Disease Prevention: Insights from Modelling Incremental Cost Effectiveness

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2003 Dec 4
PMID 14644970
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine which treatments for preventing coronary heart disease should be offered to which patients by assessing their incremental cost effectiveness.

Design: Modelling study.

Data Sources: Cost estimates (for NHS) and estimates of effectiveness obtained for aspirin, antihypertensive drugs, statins and clopidogrel.

Data Synthesis: Treatment effects were assumed to be independent, and cost per coronary event prevented was calculated for treatments individually and in combination across patients at a range of coronary risks.

Results: The most cost effective preventive treatments are aspirin, initial antihypertensive treatment (bendrofluazide and atenolol), and intensive antihypertensive treatment (bendrofluazide, atenolol and enalapril), whereas simvastatin and clopidogrel are the least cost effective (cost per coronary event prevented in a patient at 10% coronary risk over five years is 3500 pounds sterling for aspirin, 12 500 pounds sterling for initial antihypertensives, 18 300 pounds sterling for intensive antihypertensives, 60 000 pounds sterling for clopidogrel, and 61 400 pounds sterling for simvastatin). Aspirin in a patient at 5% five year coronary risk costs less than a fifth as much per event prevented (7900 pounds sterling) as simvastatin in a patient at 30% five year risk (40 800 pounds sterling).

Discussion: A cost effective prevention strategy would offer aspirin and initial antihypertensive treatment to all patients at greater than 7.5% five year coronary risk before offering statins or clopidogrel to patients at greater than 15% five year coronary risk. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of treatments produces robust, practical cost effectiveness rankings that can be used to inform treatment guidelines.

Citing Articles

for Pharmacy Services Quality Improvement-A Bridge to Cross the Quality Chasm.

Curtiss F, Fry R, Avey S J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020; 26(7):798-816.

PMID: 32584678 PMC: 10390928. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.7.798.


Why is my hypertensive patient still not controlled?.

Filippi A, Degli Esposti L, Buda S, Diguardo A, Paolini I, Nati G High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2014; 22(1):69-72.

PMID: 25421005 DOI: 10.1007/s40292-014-0075-y.


The global risk approach should be better applied in French hypertensive patients: a comparison between simulation and observation studies.

Marchant I, Nony P, Cucherat M, Boissel J, Thomas S, Bejan-Angoulvant T PLoS One. 2011; 6(3):e17508.

PMID: 21408615 PMC: 3048301. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017508.


Predicting the effectiveness of prevention: a role for epidemiological modeling.

Walls H, Peeters A, Reid C, Liew D, McNeil J J Prim Prev. 2008; 29(4):295-305.

PMID: 18581234 DOI: 10.1007/s10935-008-0143-y.


Prescription drug expenditures and population demographics.

Morgan S Health Serv Res. 2006; 41(2):411-28.

PMID: 16584456 PMC: 1702520. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00495.x.


References
1.
Hankey G, Sudlow C, Dunbabin D . Thienopyridine derivatives (ticlopidine, clopidogrel) versus aspirin for preventing stroke and other serious vascular events in high vascular risk patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (2):CD001246. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001246. View

2.
Law M, Wald N, Morris J, Jordan R . Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials. BMJ. 2003; 326(7404):1427. PMC: 162261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1427. View

3.
Gaspoz J, Coxson P, Goldman P, Williams L, M Kuntz K, Hunink M . Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(23):1800-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200206063462309. View

4.
Anderson K, Wilson P, Odell P, Kannel W . An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991; 83(1):356-62. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.356. View

5.
Song F, Altman D, Glenny A, Deeks J . Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 326(7387):472. PMC: 150178. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.472. View