» Articles » PMID: 14644719

A 3-month Randomized Controlled Trial of Bimatoprost (LUMIGAN) Versus Combined Timolol and Dorzolamide (Cosopt) in Patients with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2003 Dec 4
PMID 14644719
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost (LUMIGAN; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) once daily with that of topical combined timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt; Merck and Co, Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ) twice daily.

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, multicenter clinical trial.

Participants: One hundred seventy-seven patients with a diagnosis of glaucoma or ocular hypertension and inadequate control of intraocular pressure (IOP) after at least 2 weeks of topical timolol maleate 0.5% monotherapy.

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (n = 90) or combined timolol 0.5% and dorzolamide 2% twice daily (n = 87) over a 3-month period.

Main Outcome Measures: Intraocular pressure, the primary end point, was measured at 8 AM and 10 AM at baseline, week 1, and months 1, 2, and 3, and also at 4 PM and 8 PM at baseline and month 3.

Results: Bimatoprost provided significantly greater IOP lowering compared with combined timolol and dorzolamide. At the 8 AM measurements, bimatoprost lowered mean IOP 6.8 mmHg to 7.6 mmHg from baseline, whereas combined timolol and dorzolamide lowered mean IOP 4.4 to 5.0 mmHg from baseline (P<0.001). At the last follow-up, patients had better diurnal IOP control with bimatoprost than combined timolol and dorzolamide. At 8 AM at the 3-month visit, the percentages of patients achieving IOPs of <or =13 mmHg, < or =14 mmHg, < or =15 mmHg, or < or =16 mmHg were more than twice as high for bimatoprost than for combined timolol and dorzolamide (all P< or =0.008). Taste perversion, ocular burning, and stinging with instillation were more common with combined timolol and dorzolamide, whereas conjunctival hyperemia was more common with bimatoprost.

Conclusions: In individuals with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, uncontrolled on a topical beta-blocker alone, bimatoprost lowered IOP more consistently than did combined timolol and dorzolamide.

Citing Articles

Dorzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination: Learning from the Past and Looking Toward the Future.

Konstas A, Schmetterer L, Katsanos A, Hutnik C, Hollo G, Quaranta L Adv Ther. 2020; 38(1):24-51.

PMID: 33108623 PMC: 7854404. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01525-5.


Efficacy, safety and tolerability of combination therapy with timolol and dorzolamide in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Ichhpujani P, Katz L Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011; 2:73-83.

PMID: 21701619 PMC: 3108696. DOI: 10.2147/dhps.s9757.


Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fixed combination therapy with dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and timolol maleate 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Bell N, Ramos J, Feldman R Clin Ophthalmol. 2010; 4:1331-46.

PMID: 21139674 PMC: 2993108. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S14054.


Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension.

Lee A, McCluskey P Clin Ophthalmol. 2010; 4:741-64.

PMID: 20689791 PMC: 2915861. DOI: 10.2147/opth.s10441.


Bimatoprost: a review of its use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Curran M Drugs Aging. 2009; 26(12):1049-71.

PMID: 19929032 DOI: 10.2165/11203210-000000000-00000.