» Articles » PMID: 14639475

Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Approach to Acutely Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2003 Nov 26
PMID 14639475
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic treatment of acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia is uncommon and still controversial. Those being performed almost all use the transabdominal (TAPP) approach. The authors here present their experience with totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of acutely incarcerated hernia.

Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken to evaluate the authors' experience with this procedure over a 4-year period. There were 16 cases, 5 of which were performed using a conventional anterior repair. These 5 cases were excluded from the review. The surgery for all of the remaining 11 acutely incarcerated hernias was started laparoscopically using the TEP approach. Eight of the cases were completed this way, whereas three were converted to the open procedure. In addition to standard TEP repair techniques, a releasing incision is required for acutely incarcerated direct, indirect, or femoral hernias. With a direct hernia, the opening of the defect is enlarged to allow safe dissection of its contents. A releasing incision is made at the anteromedial aspect of the defect to avoid injury to the epigastric or iliac vessels. With an indirect hernia, several additional steps are required. The epigastric vessels may be divided; an additional trocar may be placed laterally below the linea semicircularis to facilitate dissection of the sac and to assist with suturing of the divided sac; and the deep internal ring is divided anteriorly at the 12 o'clock position toward the external ring, facilitating dissection of the indirect sac. With a femoral hernia, a releasing incision is made by carefully incising the insertion of the iliopubic tract into Cooper's ligament at the medial portion of the femoral ring.

Results: The mean operative time was 50 min (range, 20-120 min), and the length of hospital stay was 5.4 days (range, 1-29 days). During a follow-up period of 9 to 69 months, there was no recurrence, and only two complications. One of these complications was an infected mesh that occurred in a case involving cecal injury. It was treated with continuous irrigation and salvaged. The other complication was a midline wound infection after a small bowel resection for a strangulated obturator hernia.

Conclusions: Familiarity with the anatomy involved leads to the conclusion that the laparoscopic approach, specifically the TEP procedure, can be used without hesitation even in cases of acutely incarcerated hernia.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic vs. Open Approach in Emergent Inguinal Hernia: Our Experience and Review of Literature.

Moreno-Suero F, Tallon-Aguilar L, Tinoco-Gonzalez J, Sanchez-Arteaga A, Suarez-Grau J, Alvarez-Aguilera M J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024; 2:11242.

PMID: 38515586 PMC: 10955576. DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11242.


The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part I.

Sobocki J, Pedziwiatr M, Bigda J, Holowko W, Major P, Mitura K Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18(2):187-212.

PMID: 37680734 PMC: 10481450. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.127877.


[Inguinal hernia operations-Always outpatient?].

Niebuhr H, Kockerling F, Fortelny R, Hoffmann H, Conze J, Holzheimer R Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 94(3):230-236.

PMID: 36786812 PMC: 9950173. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01818-9.


Differences in in-hospital outcomes and healthcare utilization for laparoscopic versus open approach for emergency inguinal hernia repair: a nationwide analysis.

Lee Y, Tessier L, Jong A, Zhao D, Samarasinghe Y, Doumouras A Hernia. 2023; 27(3):601-608.

PMID: 36645563 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02742-x.


Use of the Desarda Technique in Emergency Settings: a Comprehensive Review.

Coco D, Leanza S, Reina G Maedica (Bucur). 2022; 17(2):481-486.

PMID: 36032629 PMC: 9375861. DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.481.


References
1.
Bessell J, Baxter P, Riddell P, Watkin S, Maddern G . A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair as a day surgical procedure. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10(5):495-500. DOI: 10.1007/BF00188393. View

2.
Fitzgibbons Jr R, Camps J, Cornet D, Nguyen N, Litke B, Annibali R . Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 1995; 221(1):3-13. PMC: 1234490. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199501000-00002. View

3.
Paganini A, Lezoche E, Carle F, Carlei F, Favretti F, Feliciotti F . A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(7):979-86. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900760. View

4.
Stoker D, Spiegelhalter D, Singh R, Wellwood J . Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Lancet. 1994; 343(8908):1243-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92148-2. View

5.
Kald A, Anderberg B, Smedh K, Karlsson M . Transperitoneal or totally extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic hernia repair: results of 491 consecutive herniorrhaphies. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997; 7(2):86-9. View