Lessons on Measuring Construct Validity: a Commentary on Delis, Jacobson, Bondi, Hamilton, And Salmon
Overview
Psychology
Authors
Affiliations
This commentary expands on issues raised by Delis, Jacobson, Bondi, Hamilton, and Salmon, in their paper on the use of shared variance techniques to establish construct validity. Significant discussion is focused on method variance, and how this can distort the results of factor analysis. Solutions are offered for the appropriate use of factor analysis in construct validation. Examples are also provided of construct validation procedures that do not rely on correlational or shared variance techniques.
A network perspective on cognition in individuals with Parkinson's disease.
Scharfenberg D, Kalbe E, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Berg D, Hilker-Roggendorf R, Kassubek J Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025; 17(1):e70091.
PMID: 39996032 PMC: 11848640. DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70091.
Construct identification in the neuropsychological battery: What are we measuring?.
Bilder R, Widaman K, Bauer R, Drane D, Loring D, Umfleet L Neuropsychology. 2022; 37(4):351-372.
PMID: 35737535 PMC: 9945479. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000832.
Agelink van Rentergem J, de Vent N, Schmand B, Murre J, Staaks J, Huizenga H Neuropsychol Rev. 2020; 30(1):51-96.
PMID: 32008158 PMC: 7089912. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-019-09423-6.
Factor Analysis of an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery and the Structure of Neurocognition.
Patt V, Brown G, Thomas M, Roesch S, Taylor M, Heaton R Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017; 33(1):79-101.
PMID: 28505273 PMC: 5860522. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx043.
Larrabee G Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014; 29(7):695-714.
PMID: 25280794 PMC: 4263930. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acu049.