» Articles » PMID: 1462622

The Results of Pouch Surgery After Ileo-anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the Manometric Assessment of Pouch Continence and Its Reservoir Function

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1992 Sep 1
PMID 1462622
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anal sphincter function after restorative proctocolectomy has mainly been investigated by anal manometry. A significant decrease of basal pressure up to 45%, has been recorded postoperatively, possibly due to sphincter stretch during endoanal mucosectomy. Both abdominal mucosectomy and anastomosis at the level of the anorectal ring have been reported to prevent anal sphincter damage and lead to better continence. The striated sphincter is not significantly affected by the surgical procedure. Pouch-anal inhibitory reflex is partly maintained in the presence of a rectal cuff which leaves the ganglionic plexus unaltered; a satisfactory continence is also retained in the absence of the reflex when the rectum is totally excised. Pouch capacity, compliance and motility have been investigated by endoluminal balloon and probes. Pouch emptying has been studied by a "porridge" test, by a semi-solid medium labelled with technetium-99, and by other methods. A more effective storage function is achieved by large capacity reservoirs which lower the bowel frequency. The motor response to pouch distension, to a meal, and to pharmacological stimuli is usually counteracted by sphincter contraction. Ileal hypermotility may lead to fecal leakage mainly in the presence of weak sphincters. Poor pouch emptying may be related to an anal stricture.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Rink A, Nagelschmidt M, Radinski I, Vestweber K Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23(8):807-15.

PMID: 18438676 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0473-5.


Assessments of anal canal sensitivity in patients with soiling 5 years or more after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Tomita R, Igarashi S World J Surg. 2006; 31(1):210-6.

PMID: 17180565 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0022-8.

References
1.
Varma J, Smith A . Anorectal profilometry with the microtransducer. Br J Surg. 1984; 71(11):867-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800711122. View

2.
Stryker S, Kelly K, Phillips S, Dozois R, Beart Jr R . Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1986; 203(1):55-61. PMC: 1251039. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198601000-00010. View

3.
Lavery I, Tuckson W, Easley K . Internal anal sphincter function after total abdominal colectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989; 32(11):950-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF02552271. View

4.
Slors J, Taat C, BRUMMELKAMP W . Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without rectal muscular cuff. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989; 4(3):178-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF01649699. View

5.
Vasilevsky C, Rothenberger D, Goldberg S . The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. World J Surg. 1987; 11(6):742-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF01656597. View