» Articles » PMID: 14615080

Differential Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability During Observation, Mental Imagery and Imitation of Hand Actions

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2003 Nov 15
PMID 14615080
Citations 67
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, we attempted to better delineate the changes in corticospinal excitability that accompany perceptual to motor transformations when people are asked to observe, image or imitate actions. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the dominant hand (15 right, 4 left) in five different conditions: (1) passive observation; (2) observation to imitate; (3) imagery; (4) imitation; and (5) counting backwards mentally. MEPs were also recorded at rest at the beginning and at the end of the session to establish baseline (BL) values. For the observation conditions, participants (n=19, 18-38 years) watched video sequences (5s) of hand actions performed by a model with the right arm (passive observation: scissors; observation to imitate: OK sign). Active imitation produced the greatest MEP facilitation compared to baseline, followed by the two observation conditions and the imagery conditions, which all produced similar levels of facilitation (post hoc comparisons). Mental counting produced some facilitation, but this effect was inconsistent. Baseline MEPs remained stable at the end of the session. A further comparison between right-handers (n=15) and left-handers (n=4) revealed no difference in the pattern of modulation across conditions. The similarity found between observation and imagery of hand actions in terms of corticospinal facilitation is interpreted in the light of the motor-simulation theory of Jeannerod [Neuroimage 14 (2001)], which proposes that perceiving actions involves neural simulation of the same action by the observer, thereby explaining the parallel between actions observed and actions imaged at the representational level.

Citing Articles

Corticospinal excitability is not facilitated by observation of asymmetric walking on a split-belt treadmill in humans.

Kitamura M, Ishikura T, Kamibayashi K Neuroreport. 2024; 36(3):140-144.

PMID: 39708342 PMC: 11781542. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000002129.


Explicit and implicit motor simulations are impaired in individuals with aphantasia.

Dupont W, Papaxanthis C, Madden-Lombardi C, Lebon F Brain Commun. 2024; 6(2):fcae072.

PMID: 38515440 PMC: 10957132. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae072.


Cortical Reorganization after Limb Loss: Bridging the Gap between Basic Science and Clinical Recovery.

Sparling T, Iyer L, Pasquina P, Petrus E J Neurosci. 2024; 44(1).

PMID: 38171645 PMC: 10851691. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1051-23.2023.


The Influence of Resistance Training Experience on the Efficacy of Motor Imagery for Acutely Increasing Corticospinal Excitability.

Parsowith E, Stock M, Girts R, Beausejour J, Alberto A, Carr J Brain Sci. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38137083 PMC: 10742069. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13121635.


Corticospinal excitability during observation of basketball free-throw movement: Effects of video playback speed and stimulus timing.

Kitamura M, Yamamoto K, Oshima A, Kamibayashi K PLoS One. 2023; 18(9):e0292060.

PMID: 37768947 PMC: 10538764. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292060.