» Articles » PMID: 14613605

Expression of FGF2 in the Limb Blastema of Two Salamandridae Correlates with Their Regenerative Capability

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2003 Nov 14
PMID 14613605
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limb regenerative potential in urodeles seems to vary among different species. We observed that Triturus vulgaris meridionalis regenerate their limbs significantly faster than T. carnifex, where a long gap between the time of amputation and blastema formation occurs, and tried to identify cellular and molecular events that may underlie these differences in regenerative capability. Whereas wound healing is comparable in the two species, formation of an apical epidermal cap (AEC), which is required for blastema outgrowth, is delayed for approximately three weeks in T. carnifex. Furthermore, fewer nerve fibres are present distally early after amputation, consistent with the late onset of blastemal cell proliferation observed in T. carnifex. We investigated whether different expression of putative blastema mitogens, such as FGF1 and FGF2, in these species may underlie differences in the progression of regeneration. We found that whereas FGF1 is detected in the epidermis throughout the regenerative process, FGF2 onset of expression in the wound epidermis of both species coincides with AEC formation and initiation of blastemal cell proliferation, which is delayed in T. carnifex, and declines thereafter. In vitro studies showed that FGF2 activates MCM3, a factor essential for DNA replication licensing activity, and can be produced by blastemal cells themselves, indicating an autocrine action. These results suggest that FGF2 plays a key role in the initiation of blastema growth.

Citing Articles

Inducing Vertebrate Limb Regeneration: A Review of Past Advances and Future Outlook.

Davidian D, Levin M Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2021; 14(4).

PMID: 34400551 PMC: 9121900. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040782.


Extracellular Matrix and Cellular Plasticity in Musculoskeletal Development.

Ma S, Chan A, Rubab A, Chan W, Chan D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 8:781.

PMID: 32984311 PMC: 7477050. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00781.


Comparative iTRAQ proteomics revealed proteins associated with lobed fin regeneration in Bichirs.

Lu S, Xiong Q, Du K, Gan X, Wang X, Yang L Proteome Sci. 2019; 17:6.

PMID: 31832023 PMC: 6869209. DOI: 10.1186/s12953-019-0153-0.


Experimentally induced metamorphosis in axolotls reduces regenerative rate and fidelity.

Monaghan J, Stier A, Michonneau F, Smith M, Pasch B, Maden M Regeneration (Oxf). 2016; 1(1):2-14.

PMID: 27499857 PMC: 4895291. DOI: 10.1002/reg2.8.


Developmental coupling of larval and adult stages in a complex life cycle: insights from limb regeneration in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Lee A, Sze C, Kim E, Suzuki Y Evodevo. 2013; 4(1):20.

PMID: 23826799 PMC: 3711857. DOI: 10.1186/2041-9139-4-20.


References
1.
Poulin M, Chiu I . Re-programming of expression of the KGFR and bek variants of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 during limb regeneration in newts (Notophthalmus viridescens). Dev Dyn. 1995; 202(4):378-87. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1002020407. View

2.
OHara C, Egar M, Chernoff E . Reorganization of the ependyma during axolotl spinal cord regeneration: changes in intermediate filament and fibronectin expression. Dev Dyn. 1992; 193(2):103-15. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001930202. View

3.
West F, Attwood C, Charnock D, REES R, ONEILL J . Medical Expert Panels for Malpractice Cases-C.M.A. Liaison Committee with the State Bar of California. Calif Med. 1960; 93(5):311-2. PMC: 1578344. View

4.
Zenjari C, Boilly-Marer Y, Desbiens X, Oudghir M, Hondermarck H, Boilly B . Experimental evidence for FGF-1 control of blastema cell proliferation during limb regeneration of the amphibian Pleurodeles waltl. Int J Dev Biol. 1996; 40(5):965-71. View

5.
Mullen L, Bryant S, Torok M, Blumberg B, Gardiner D . Nerve dependency of regeneration: the role of Distal-less and FGF signaling in amphibian limb regeneration. Development. 1996; 122(11):3487-97. DOI: 10.1242/dev.122.11.3487. View