» Articles » PMID: 14606961

Amplified RNA Degradation in T7-amplification Methods Results in Biased Microarray Hybridizations

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2003 Nov 11
PMID 14606961
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The amplification of RNA with the T7-System is a widely used technique for obtaining increased amounts of RNA starting from limited material. The amplified RNA (aRNA) can subsequently be used for microarray hybridizations, warranting sufficient signal for image analysis. We describe here an amplification-time dependent degradation of aRNA in prolonged standard T7 amplification protocols, that results in lower average size aRNA and decreased yields.

Results: A time-dependent degradation of amplified RNA (aRNA) could be observed when using the classical "Eberwine" T7-Amplification method. When the amplification was conducted for more than 4 hours, the resulting aRNA showed a significantly smaller size distribution on gel electrophoresis and a concomitant reduction of aRNA yield. The degradation of aRNA could be correlated to the presence of the T7 RNA Polymerase in the amplification cocktail. The aRNA degradation resulted in a strong bias in microarray hybridizations with a high coefficient of variation and a significant reduction of signals of certain transcripts, that seem to be susceptible to this RNA degrading activity. The time-dependent degradation of these transcripts was verified by a real-time PCR approach.

Conclusions: It is important to perform amplifications not longer than 4 hours as there is a characteristic 'quality vs. yield' situation for longer amplification times. When conducting microarray hybridizations it is important not to compare results obtained with aRNA from different amplification times.

Citing Articles

Robust transcriptional signatures for low-input RNA samples based on relative expression orderings.

Liu H, Li Y, He J, Guan Q, Chen R, Yan H BMC Genomics. 2017; 18(1):913.

PMID: 29179677 PMC: 5704640. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4280-7.


Genome-Wide Analysis of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Cells and Tissues.

Kebschull M, Hulsmann C, Hoffmann P, Papapanou P Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1537:307-326.

PMID: 27924602 PMC: 6554644. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6685-1_18.


Comparative analysis of response to selection with three insecticides in the dengue mosquito Aedes aegypti using mRNA sequencing.

David J, Faucon F, Chandor-Proust A, Poupardin R, Riaz M, Bonin A BMC Genomics. 2014; 15:174.

PMID: 24593293 PMC: 4029067. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-174.


Adjustment method for microarray data generated using two-cycle RNA labeling protocol.

Wang F, Chen R, Ji D, Bai S, Qian M, Deng M BMC Genomics. 2013; 14:31.

PMID: 23324182 PMC: 3658951. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-31.


Estimating RNA-quality using GeneChip microarrays.

Fasold M, Binder H BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:186.

PMID: 22583818 PMC: 3519671. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-186.


References
1.
Bowtell D . Options available--from start to finish--for obtaining expression data by microarray. Nat Genet. 1999; 21(1 Suppl):25-32. DOI: 10.1038/4455. View

2.
Lockhart D, Winzeler E . Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature. 2000; 405(6788):827-36. DOI: 10.1038/35015701. View

3.
Baugh L, Hill A, Brown E, Hunter C . Quantitative analysis of mRNA amplification by in vitro transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(5):E29. PMC: 29742. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.5.e29. View

4.
Schena M, Shalon D, Davis R, Brown P . Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995; 270(5235):467-70. DOI: 10.1126/science.270.5235.467. View

5.
Van Gelder R, von Zastrow M, Yool A, Dement W, Barchas J, Eberwine J . Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87(5):1663-7. PMC: 53542. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1663. View