» Articles » PMID: 14605799

Functional Outcome and Quality of Life Following Hip Fracture in Elderly Women: a Prospective Controlled Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2003 Nov 8
PMID 14605799
Citations 92
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to document the functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) over 1 year following hip fracture in elderly women. A total of 159 unselected elderly women with a first hip fracture were matched for age and residence with an equal number of control women. Functional status was measured by completing a Rapid Disability Rating Scale version 2 (RDRS-2) questionnaire [score ranging from 0 (best) to 54 (worse)], before hospital discharge and 12 months later. To examine longitudinal change in health-related QoL, fracture subjects and controls completed the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. For the 134 women still alive at 1 year, the mean RDRS-2 score before hospital discharge was 16.2 (95% CI: 15.0-18.0) and 3.5 (2.6-4.3) in patients and controls, respectively ( P<0.001). During the year following hospital discharge, the mean RDRS-2 score improved to 13.0 (11.1-14.1) in hip-fracture women and worsened to 4.3 (3.3-5.0) in the control group (differences with initial scores: P<0.001 in both groups). After adjustment for potential confounders (including age and comorbidity), the estimated functional decline attributable to a hip fracture was 24% in the first year. Poor functional status upon discharge was the strongest predictor of a poor functional status at 1 year. Overall, similar trends were observed when using SF-36 scores as compared with RDRS-2 scores. However, only 51% of the study population was able to complete the SF-36 questionnaire at discharge and after 1 year, and these subjects were considerably younger ( P<0.001), had less cognitive impairment ( P<0.001), and had better functional status ( P<0.001) than those who were unable to complete the SF-36. For those women able to complete the SF-36 questionnaires, the mean SF-36 score before hospital discharge was 56.4 (95% CI: 51.9-60.9) and 71.1 (67.5-74.8) in patients and controls, respectively ( P<0.001). During the year following hospital discharge, the mean SF-36 score improved significantly to 61.1 (56.5-65.7) in hip-fracture patients ( P=0.03), but remained unchanged in the control group ( P=0.23). Overall, the results of this study indicate that women who sustain a hip fracture continue to suffer from substantial functional impairment and loss in QoL at 1 year, despite a significant recovery during this 12-month period. Function upon hospital discharge is the strongest predictor of functional status 1 year later. Assessing QoL in hip fracture women through self-administered questionnaires is subject to considerable bias due to non-response.

Citing Articles

Effect of oral trehalose supplementation on inflammation and wound healing in patients with peri-trochanteric fractures: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Zandi R, Tavallaei Zavareh A, Mehrvar A, Jowshan M, Sahebkar A, Nikooyeh B BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e092092.

PMID: 39627130 PMC: 11624808. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092092.


Prediction of walking speed one year following hip fracture based on pre-fracture assessments of mobility and physical activity.

Heiberg K, Beckmann M, Bruun-Olsen V BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):358.

PMID: 38649830 PMC: 11036605. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04926-1.


Factors associated with non-initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy after hip fracture: analysis of claims data in Japan.

Fujii T, Mori T, Komiyama J, Kuroda N, Tamiya N Arch Osteoporos. 2023; 18(1):103.

PMID: 37477723 PMC: 10361872. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01314-x.


Intramedullary Nailing vs Sliding Hip Screw in Trochanteric Fracture Management: The INSITE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Schemitsch E, Nowak L, Schulz A, Brink O, Poolman R, Mehta S JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6):e2317164.

PMID: 37278998 PMC: 10245197. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17164.


Ethnic determinants of skeletal health in female patients with fragility fracture in a culturally diverse population.

Hu K, Cassimatis M, Nguyen M, Girgis C Bone Rep. 2023; 18:101677.

PMID: 37101568 PMC: 10123337. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101677.


References
1.
Wolinsky F, Fitzgerald J, Stump T . The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(3):398-403. PMC: 1381011. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.398. View

2.
Meyer H, Henriksen C, Falch J, Pedersen J, Tverdal A . Risk factors for hip fracture in a high incidence area: a case-control study from Oslo, Norway. Osteoporos Int. 1995; 5(4):239-46. DOI: 10.1007/BF01774013. View

3.
Hall S, Criddle R, Comito T, Prince R . A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 9(6):508-15. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050178. View

4.
Mossey J, Mutran E, Knott K, Craik R . Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors. Am J Public Health. 1989; 79(3):279-86. PMC: 1349547. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.279. View

5.
Fox K, Magaziner J, Hebel J, Kenzora J, Kashner T . Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000; 54(12):M635-40. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/54.12.m635. View