[Evaluation of Potential Liver Living Donors. Logistic and Financial Aspects]

Overview

Journal Chirurg

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2003 Nov 8

PMID 14605738

Authors

D C Broering

P Bok

L Fischer

M Sterneck

X Rogiers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing shortage of cadaveric organs makes living-related liver transplantation a more and more important option. Safety for the donor has the highest priority, and therefore detailed and thorough evaluation is needed.

Materials And Methods: All potential donors who had been evaluated at our center from January 2001 to March 2002 ( n=100) were included in a retrospective study to analyse the qualitative, logistical, and economic aspects of the evaluation.

Results: Seventy-three percent of the potential donors were found to be unsuitable for living donation during the evaluation process. The main reasons were: uncompatible blood group, availability of cadaveric transplant by Eurotransplant, steatosis of more than 10% of hepatocytes in liver biopsy, insufficient liver volume, and psychosocial reasons. The expenditure for all scheduled investigations was 4,469 euro for a complete evaluation.

Conclusion: While on the one hand, high standards of the evaluation process must be guaranteed, insufficient reimbursement on the other should not lead centers to reduce either quantity or quality of necessary examinations entered in the evaluation protocol.

References

. American Society of Transplant Surgeons' position paper on adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2000; 6(6):815-7. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2000.18465. View

Rinella M, Alonso E, Rao S, Whitington P, Fryer J, Abecassis M . Body mass index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors. Liver Transpl. 2001; 7(5):409-14. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2001.23787. View

Durand F, Ettorre G, Douard R, Denninger M, Kianmanesh A, Sommacale D . Donor safety in living related liver transplantation: underestimation of the risks for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Liver Transpl. 2002; 8(2):118-20. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2002.30596. View

Miller C, Gondolesi G, Florman S, Matsumoto C, Munoz L, Yoshizumi T . One hundred nine living donor liver transplants in adults and children: a single-center experience. Ann Surg. 2001; 234(3):301-11; discussion 311-2. PMC: 1422021. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00004. View

Seaman D . Adult living donor liver transplantation: current status. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001; 33(2):97-106. DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200108000-00002. View

Trotter J, Wachs M, Everson G, Kam I . Adult-to-adult transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(14):1074-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra011629. View

Testa G, Malago M, Broelsch C . Living-donor liver transplantation in adults. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2000; 384(6):536-43. DOI: 10.1007/s004230050240. View

Schiano T, Kim-Schluger L, Gondolesi G, Miller C . Adult living donor liver transplantation: the hepatologist's perspective. Hepatology. 2000; 33(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.21489. View

Samstein B, Emond J . Liver transplants from living related donors. Annu Rev Med. 2001; 52:147-60. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.147. View

10.

Sterneck M, Fischer L, Nischwitz U, Burdelski M, Kjer S, Latta A . Selection of the living liver donor. Transplantation. 1995; 60(7):667-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199510150-00009. View

11.

Marcos A . Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: a review. Liver Transpl. 2000; 6(1):3-20. DOI: 10.1002/lt.500060117. View

12.

Malago M, Testa G, Marcos A, Fung J, Siegler M, Cronin D . Ethical considerations and rationale of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2001; 7(10):921-7. DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2001.28301. View