» Articles » PMID: 14586530

Incidence and Severity of Intravenous Drug Errors in a German Hospital

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2003 Oct 31
PMID 14586530
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence of errors in preparing and administering intravenous (i.v.) drugs, identify the stages in the process at which errors occurred and evaluate their clinical importance.

Methods: A prospective ethnographic study using disguised observation was carried out on two wards in one German non-university hospital.

Results: We observed 22 nurses administering 122 i.v. drug preparations and administrations. One or more errors occurred in the preparation and administration of 58 of 122 i.v. drug doses (error rate 48%, 95% confidence interval 39-57%). In total, 65 errors were identified. Of doses, 4 had potentially severe errors (3%), 38 (31%) potentially moderate errors and 16 (13%) potentially minor errors. Common errors included multiple step preparations and the co-administration of potentially incompatible drugs as intermittent infusions.

Conclusion: A high incidence of i.v. drug errors was found in the study hospital. Effective strategies to reduce potentially harmful errors are urgently needed. Measures could include a reduction in the number of ward-based i.v. drug preparations, improvement of staff training and the introduction of ward-based clinical pharmacy services.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Costs of Intravenous Push Waste in Intraoperative Areas Through Observation: A Multi-site Study.

Hertig J, Louden L, Shay B, Soto A, Robbins G, Kornilova T Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024; 11(4):635-645.

PMID: 39390304 PMC: 11589042. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-024-00456-9.


Evaluation of the Impact of Infusion Set Design on the Particulate Load Induced by Vancomycin-Piperacillin/Tazobactam Incompatibility.

Negrier L, Decaudin B, Treizebre A, Guilbert M, Odou P, Martin Mena A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(9).

PMID: 39338384 PMC: 11435023. DOI: 10.3390/ph17091222.


Frontline nursing staff's perceptions of intravenous medication administration: the first step toward safer infusion processes-a qualitative study.

Uramatsu M, Kimura N, Kojima T, Fujisawa Y, Oto T, Barach P BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38942437 PMC: 11216072. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002809.


Evaluating deviations and considerations in daily practice when double-checking high-risk medication administration: A qualitative study using the FRAM.

van Stralen S, van Eikenhorst L, Vonk A, Schutijser B, Wagner C Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e25637.

PMID: 38380025 PMC: 10877242. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25637.


Assessing the severity of medication administration errors identified in an observational study using a valid and reliable method.

Assuncao-Costa L, Pinto C, Machado J, Valli C, Souza L J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023; 16(1):143.

PMID: 37964342 PMC: 10648330. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-023-00653-x.


References
1.
Taxis K, Barber N . Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12(5):343-7. PMC: 1743768. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.343. View

2.
Taxis K, Barber N . Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors. BMJ. 2003; 326(7391):684. PMC: 152365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.684. View

3.
Taxis K, Dean B, Barber N . The validation of an existing method of scoring the severity of medication administration errors for use in Germany. Pharm World Sci. 2003; 24(6):236-9. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021521014172. View

4.
Dean B, Barber N . A validated, reliable method of scoring the severity of medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999; 56(1):57-62. DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/56.1.57. View

5.
Wirtz V, Taxis K, Barber N . An observational study of intravenous medication errors in the United Kingdom and in Germany. Pharm World Sci. 2003; 25(3):104-11. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024009000113. View