» Articles » PMID: 14573671

Evidence for a Novel Gene Expression Program in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Mycobacterium Avium Subsp. Paratuberculosis-infected Cattle

Overview
Journal Infect Immun
Date 2003 Oct 24
PMID 14573671
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A bovine-specific cDNA microarray system was used to compare gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from control uninfected (n = 4) and Johne's disease-positive (n = 6) Holstein cows. Microarray experiments were designed so that for each animal, a direct comparison was made between PBMCs stimulated in vitro with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and PBMCs stimulated with phosphate-buffered saline (nil-stimulated PBMCs). As expected, M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis stimulation of infected cow PBMCs enhanced expression of gamma interferon transcripts. In addition, expression of 15 other genes was significantly affected (>1.25-fold change; P < 0.05) by in vitro stimulation with M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Similar treatment of control cow PBMCs with M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis resulted in significant changes in expression of 13 genes, only 2 of which were also affected in PBMCs from the infected cow PBMCs. To compare gene expression patterns in the two cow infection groups (infected cows and uninfected cows), a mixed-model analysis was performed with the microarray data. This analysis indicated that there were major differences in the gene expression patterns between cells isolated from the two groups of cows, regardless of in vitro stimulation. A total of 86 genes were significantly differentially expressed (P < 0.01) in M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis-stimulated PBMCs from infected cows compared to expression in similarly treated PBMCs from control cows. Surprisingly, a larger number of genes (110 genes) were also found to be significantly differentially expressed (P < 0.01) in nil-stimulated cells from the two infection groups. The expression patterns of selected genes were substantiated by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR. Flow cytometric analysis indicated that there were no gross differences in the relative populations of major immune cell types in PBMCs from infected and control cows. Thus, data presented in this report indicate that the gene expression program of PBMCs from M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis-infected cows is inherently different from that of cells from control uninfected cows.

Citing Articles

Ruminal background of predisposed milk urea (MU) concentration in Holsteins.

Honerlagen H, Reyer H, Segelke D, Muller C, Prahl M, Ponsuksili S Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:939711.

PMID: 36177471 PMC: 9513179. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.939711.


Modelling Bovine Granuloma Formation In Vitro upon Infection with Subspecies .

Rice J, McDaniel M, Holland A, Eda S Vet Sci. 2019; 6(4).

PMID: 31614819 PMC: 6958389. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci6040080.


Matrix metalloproteinases in inflammatory bowel disease: an update.

OSullivan S, Gilmer J, Medina C Mediators Inflamm. 2015; 2015:964131.

PMID: 25948887 PMC: 4408746. DOI: 10.1155/2015/964131.


Analysis of the Bovine Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Response to Mycobacterium avium Subspecies Paratuberculosis Infection Using RNA-seq.

Casey M, Meade K, Nalpas N, Taraktsoglou M, Browne J, Killick K Front Immunol. 2015; 6:23.

PMID: 25699042 PMC: 4316787. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00023.


Comparative functional genomics and the bovine macrophage response to strains of the mycobacterium genus.

Rue-Albrecht K, Magee D, Killick K, Nalpas N, Gordon S, MacHugh D Front Immunol. 2014; 5:536.

PMID: 25414700 PMC: 4220711. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00536.


References
1.
Strohmeier G, Fenton M . Roles of lipoarabinomannan in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Microbes Infect. 1999; 1(9):709-17. DOI: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)80072-0. View

2.
MERKAL R, Larsen A, Booth G . Analysis of the effect of inapparent bovine paratuberculosis. Am J Vet Res. 1975; 36(6):837-8. View

3.
Wells S, Wagner B . Herd-level risk factors for infection with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in US dairies and association between familiarity of the herd manager with the disease or prior diagnosis of the disease in that herd and use of preventive measures. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000; 216(9):1450-7. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2000.216.1450. View

4.
Zurbrick B, Follett D, Czuprynski C . Cytokine regulation of the intracellular growth of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine monocytes. Infect Immun. 1988; 56(7):1692-7. PMC: 259464. DOI: 10.1128/iai.56.7.1692-1697.1988. View

5.
Seitz S, Heider L, Heuston W, Rings D, Spangler L . Bovine fetal infection with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989; 194(10):1423-6. View