» Articles » PMID: 14566794

A Study on the Effect of Dual Blasting with TiO2 on Titanium Implant Surfaces on Functional Attachment in Bone

Overview
Date 2003 Oct 21
PMID 14566794
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study, the effect of a dual treatment of titanium implants and the subsequent bone response after implantation were investigated. Coin-shaped c.p. titanium implants were placed into the tibias of 12 rabbits. The implant, which was dually blasted with TiO2 particles of two different sizes, was compared with implants that were blasted with only one of these particle sizes. Implants in group 1 were grit blasted with small particles, 22-28 microm in size, and group 2 with coarser particles, 180-220 microm size. These two treatments gave different surface micro textures. To test the effect of a combination of two different treatments, group 3 implants were blasted first with the 180- to 220-microm and subsequently with the 22- to 28-microm particles. The surface topography of the implant specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy and by a confocal laser scanner and a numeric evaluation of S(a), S(t), and S(dr) was recorded. Group 2 implants, which were blasted with only the coarse particles, showed a significantly better functional attachment (p < 0.001) than the other two groups. Group 1, which was blasted with only small particles, showed the lowest retention in bone. There was a positive correlation between the topographical and mechanical evaluation of the surfaces.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Bone-Implant Contact in Various Surface-Treated Dental Implants Using High-Resolution Micro-CT in Rabbits' Bone.

Zielinski R, Puszkarz A, Pietka T, Sowinski J, Sadowska-Sowinska M, Kolkowska A Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597220 PMC: 11595991. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225396.


Surface Topography Has Less Influence on Peri-Implantitis than Patient Factors: A Comparative Clinical Study of Two Dental Implant Systems.

Hussain B, Grytten J, Rongen G, Sanz M, Haugen H ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024; 10(7):4562-4574.

PMID: 38916970 PMC: 11234333. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01809.


Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?-A Review and Meta-Study Analysis.

Haugen H, Chen H J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13(2).

PMID: 35645254 PMC: 9149859. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13020046.


Surface engineering and the application of laser-based processes to stents - A review of the latest development.

Dong J, Pacella M, Liu Y, Zhao L Bioact Mater. 2021; 10:159-184.

PMID: 34901537 PMC: 8636930. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.023.


Impact of Glutamate Carboxylation in the Adsorption of the α-1 Domain of Osteocalcin to Hydroxyapatite and Titania.

Alamdari S, Pfaendtner J Mol Syst Des Eng. 2021; 5(3):620-631.

PMID: 33791109 PMC: 8009198. DOI: 10.1039/c9me00158a.