» Articles » PMID: 14561867

Hyperdopaminergic Mutant Mice Have Higher "wanting" but Not "liking" for Sweet Rewards

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2003 Oct 17
PMID 14561867
Citations 169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

What is the role of dopamine in natural rewards? A genetic mutant approach was taken to examine the consequences of elevated synaptic dopamine on (1) spontaneous food and water intake, (2) incentive motivation and learning to obtain a palatable sweet reward in a runway task, and (3) affective "liking" reactions elicited by the taste of sucrose. A dopamine transporter (DAT) knockdown mutation that preserves only 10% of normal DAT, and therefore causes mutant mice to have 70% elevated levels of synaptic dopamine, was used to identify dopamine effects on food intake and reward. We found that hyperdopaminergic DAT knockdown mutant mice have higher food and water intake. In a runway task, they demonstrated enhanced acquisition and greater incentive performance for a sweet reward. Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice leave the start box more quickly than wild-type mice, require fewer trials to learn, pause less often in the runway, resist distractions better, and proceed more directly to the goal. Those observations suggest that hyperdopaminergic mutant mice attribute greater incentive salience ("wanting") to a sweet reward in the runway test. But sucrose taste fails to elicit higher orofacial "liking" reactions from mutant mice in an affective taste reactivity test. These results indicate that chronically elevated extracellular dopamine facilitates "wanting" and learning of an incentive motivation task for a sweet reward, but elevated dopamine does not increase "liking" reactions to the hedonic impact of sweet tastes.

Citing Articles

The long-term associations of childhood parental loss with attachment, creativity, and epigenetic regulation.

Dvilansky A, Zadok H, Shoshani A, Samra N, Verbeke W, Vrticka P Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4859.

PMID: 39924594 PMC: 11808068. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89467-2.


Melanin-concentrating hormone attenuates the hedonic feeding induced by orexin-A in the ventral tegmental area of high-fat diet male mice.

Liu X, Yang H, Xu W, Wang X, Tang W, Wang X Front Nutr. 2025; 11:1468874.

PMID: 39758319 PMC: 11697430. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1468874.


Distinct cholinergic circuits underlie discrete effects of reward on attention.

Runyon K, Bui T, Mazanek S, Hartle A, Marschalko K, Howe W Front Mol Neurosci. 2024; 17:1429316.

PMID: 39268248 PMC: 11390659. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1429316.


History and future of leptin: Discovery, regulation and signaling.

Munzberg H, Heymsfield S, Berthoud H, Morrison C Metabolism. 2024; 161:156026.

PMID: 39245434 PMC: 11570342. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2024.156026.


Opening new vistas on obsessive-compulsive disorder with the observing response task.

Pickenhan L, Milton A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(2):249-265.

PMID: 38316708 PMC: 11039534. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01153-w.


References
1.
Kelley A . Functional specificity of ventral striatal compartments in appetitive behaviors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 877:71-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09262.x. View

2.
Volkow N, Wang G, Fowler J, Logan J, Gatley S, Wong C . Reinforcing effects of psychostimulants in humans are associated with increases in brain dopamine and occupancy of D(2) receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999; 291(1):409-15. View

3.
Sarter M, Bruno J . Cortical cholinergic inputs mediating arousal, attentional processing and dreaming: differential afferent regulation of the basal forebrain by telencephalic and brainstem afferents. Neuroscience. 2000; 95(4):933-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(99)00487-x. View

4.
Berridge K . Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000; 24(2):173-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00072-x. View

5.
Feurte S, Nicolaidis S, Berridge K . Conditioned taste aversion in rats for a threonine-deficient diet: demonstration by the taste reactivity test. Physiol Behav. 2000; 68(3):423-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00202-4. View